From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Mar 2 13:54:44 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:54:44 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA19344 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:54:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA07661; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:54:41 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.2+UW99.01/8.9.2+UW99.01) with SMTP id NAA02848; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:44:58 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.2+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA40920 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:38:48 -0800 Received: from library.berkeley.edu (library.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.224.55]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA08638 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:38:48 -0800 Received: from localhost (nlin@localhost) by library.berkeley.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA29737 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:43:37 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:43:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Nancy Lin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Viewing html attachments in pine. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi - I'm having trouble viewing html attachments in pine. I've configured pine to search for the mailcap and mime.types file in my home directory. The mime.types file has the following lines: text/html html htm text/plain txt c cc h I've browsed through this list's archives for info and have tried adding either: text/html; shownonascii iso8859-1 %s; copiousoutpu ... ... or text/HTML; lynx -force_html -dump %s; copiousoutput to my mailcap file. When I send myself an html attachment, the status bar tells me that it's "sending the attachemnt as TEXT/html" But when I receive the file, it tells me: [ Part 2, "" Text/PLAIN (Name: "test.html") 121 lines. ] [ Not Shown. Use the "V" command to view or save this part. ] What am I missing? Do I need to put something else in either the mime.types or mailcap file? Why did it send it as text/plain anyway? Any help is greatly appreciated. -- Nancy -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 07:40:05 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 07:40:05 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA08858 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 07:40:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA26635; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 07:40:02 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id HAA23961; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 07:34:48 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.2+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA48598 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 07:30:58 -0800 Received: from mail1.new-york.net (SYSTEM@mail1.new-york.net [165.254.2.54]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA12787 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 07:30:56 -0800 Received: from aleph.ii.com ("port 1088"@aleph.ii.com) by mail1.new-york.net (PMDF V5.1-10 #22885) with ESMTP id <01J8E2BSXP20000523@mail1.new-york.net> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:30:36 -0500 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 10:29:44 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: alternate editor prompt request MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ii@mail1.new-york.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN When I go to fire up my alternate editor, I get this prompt: Which alternate editor ? C:\Progra~1\Vim\gvim.exe ^G Get Help ^C Cancel Since I sometimes use the mouse, it would be nice if the prompt looked like this: Which alternate editor ? C:\Progra~1\Vim\gvim.exe ^G Get Help RET Accept ^C Cancel That way I could just click on RET rather than having to take my hand off the mouse and press the Enter key. Thanks, -- For Pine info & links, see www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/ ŠNancy McGough http://www.ii.com Infinite Ink --= Sent via PINE: Power Internet News & Email for Win/Unix =-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 10:00:45 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:00:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA18231 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:00:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA30537; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:00:38 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA08836; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:51:26 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA24842 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:43:16 -0800 Received: from ruby (ruby.co.clark.nv.us [198.200.132.17]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA15980 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:43:15 -0800 Received: by ruby; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA09184; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:43:15 -0800 Received: from jade.co.clark.nv.us by mailhub.co.clark.nv.us (PMDF V5.1-12 #29712) with ESMTP id <01J8E0O5O8TG0004EX@mailhub.co.clark.nv.us> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:43:14 PST Message-Id: Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 09:43:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Joseph Scanlan To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine and IMAP servers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Greetings, I've run into a couple of interesting problems using Pine with our GroupWise IMAP server. With Pine 3.95 I can open my mailbox after I give my name and passward and read my mail with no problem. When I eXpunge my inbox Pine will usaully (but not always) give me a core dump. When I check the inbox with GroupWise, the deleted files are gone so it's not all bad. A quick look on the web and I decided to solve the problem with an upgrade. Pine 4.10 won't open my GroupWise mailbox at all. Bummer. With 3.95's mtest I get. MTest -- C client test program Debug protocol (y/n)?y Mailbox ('?' for help): {ccgwgate.co.clark.nv.us:143}INBOX * OK GroupWise IMAP4rev1 Server Ready [GroupWise IMAP4rev1 Server Ready] {ccgwgate.co.clark.nv.us} username: jps password: pass A00000 LOGIN jps pass A00000 OK LOGIN completed A00001 SELECT INBOX * 9 EXISTS * OK [UNSEEN 5] [[UNSEEN 5]] * OK [UIDVALIDITY 7811] [[UIDVALIDITY 7811]] * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] [[PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)]] A00001 OK SELECT completed Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:10:57 -0800 (PST) imap2 mailbox: {ccgwgate.co.clark.nv.us}INBOX, 9 messages, 0 recent MTest>quit A00002 LOGOUT * BYE IMAP4rev1 Server Disconnect A00002 OK LOGOUT completed With 4.10's mtest I get. MTest -- C client test program Debug protocol (y/n)?y Mailbox ('?' for help): {ccgwgate.co.clark.nv.us:143}INBOX [Trying IP address [172.20.100.85]] * OK GroupWise IMAP4rev1 Server Ready [GroupWise IMAP4rev1 Server Ready] 00000000 CAPABILITY * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 AUTH-LOGIN 00000000 OK CAPABILITY completed 00000001 AUTHENTICATE LOGIN 00000001 OK AUTHENTICATE completed ?Can not authenticate to IMAP server: AUTHENTICATE completed 00000002 LOGOUT * BYE IMAP4rev1 Server Disconnect 00000002 OK LOGOUT completed Any ideas? ------------- My opinions are mine alone, and that fact ------------- ------------- provides intense relief for my coworkers. ------------- Joe Scanlan Clark County CEIT Systems Programmer fax 702 455-4932 n7xsd@qsl.net (not work) PO Box 551761 jps@co.clark.nv.us (work) Las Vegas, NV 89155-1761 http://www.co.clark.nv.us USA -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 10:19:53 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:19:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA17320 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA26472; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:19:44 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id KAA11500; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:15:12 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA25026 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:07:07 -0800 Received: from phsexchici.partners.org (phsexchici.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.126.51]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA24754 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:07:06 -0800 Received: from helix.mgh.harvard.edu by phsexchici.partners.org with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1459.30) id GF3KKPT3; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:07:05 -0500 Received: from localhost by helix.mgh.harvard.edu (8.8.7/1.1.20.3/31Dec98-1151AM) id NAA0000017883; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:07:14 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:07:13 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: Dennis Gurgul Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Dennis Gurgul To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: y2k MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Helix Operator X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm using 3.95. Below is from the web faq. Does "middle of next century" mean something like June 15, 2000? Does this mean something like Feb 1, 2000 is NOT in the middle of the next century? Or is this the 2038 thing? Thanks, Dennis ----------------- Internally, Pine has never stored years as two digit values. The "last-time-pruned" variable might appear to be problematic, as this century's dates are represented as two characters, but this value is relative to the year 1900, so the year 2000 will be represented as "100" and so on. However, Pine version 3.96 and earlier do have a bug in their date-sort routines for the message index such that messages with a date in the middle of the next century will incorrectly sort before current messages. This bug is corrected in the Pine 4.00 code base. Dennis J. Gurgul Helix Server Management 617.724.3169 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 10:47:01 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:46:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA20735 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA31925; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:46:50 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id KAA10780; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:40:47 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA33870 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:35:42 -0800 Received: from poison.slackinc.com (smtp.slackinc.com [206.0.70.39]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA30727 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:35:41 -0800 Received: by POISON with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id <15LTKL71>; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:21:30 -0500 Message-Id: <0089B6FA4F0DD211AD4E0001FA7E5055B843AE@POISON> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:21:29 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: George Gallen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: sending attachments that pine can read.. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-To: "'Pine List'" X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm attempting to mix text and an attachment in an email. What I'm doing is: (cat pathoftext ; cat pathoffile | uuencode attachmentname) | mailx -s test emailaddress When MSexchange/Outlook receives this, I get an email with pathoftext in the email body and pathoffile as an attachment named attachmentname. (no problem). However, when that same email is read by pine, It doesn't display it as text with an option to view the attachment, just the plain text then the uuencoded text of the file. I realize I'm still going to have to uudecode it, but I don't want the email body text to be saved along with the uuencoded text. As well If uuencode more than one file, MSexchange will show it as multiple attachements, with pine it still shows as one email (no attachments). It just makes it more difficult to save and decode. Thanks George Gallen ggallen@slackinc.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 16:11:22 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:11:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA28002 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:11:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA03695; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:11:17 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id QAA07993; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:08:48 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA20046 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:05:11 -0800 Received: from library.berkeley.edu (library.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.224.55]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA31507 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:05:10 -0800 Received: from localhost (nlin@localhost) by library.berkeley.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA21669 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:10:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:09:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Nancy Lin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Viewing html attachments in pine. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi - This is a followup to my question regarding mailcap and mime.types yesterday. I've been poking around a bit more. It seems that it doesn't matter what you define in the mime.types file, what suffix your file has, or what pine says it's sending your attachment as. Pine will look through your attachment and determine its type and change it if necessary. For example, I named a file as blah.gif. It only has the line "hihi" in it. I define in my mime.types file image/gif gif When I send the file as an attachment, pine tells me that it's sending it as image/gif. However, when I receive it and I look at the content type, it sent it as text/plain. It's obviously looking through the file and overriding what I told it the file should be. My question is, is this a bug or a feature? Thanks -- Nancy From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Wed Mar 3 21:22:36 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:22:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA30107 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:22:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA09224; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:22:28 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id VAA22373; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:19:40 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA42752 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:15:35 -0800 Received: from mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.41]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA05069 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:15:34 -0800 Received: from DAD ([12.72.38.110]) by mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07 118 124) with SMTP id <19990304051527.DFMJ22271@DAD> for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 05:15:27 +0000 Received: by DAD with Microsoft Mail id <01BE65C3.77621FA0@DAD>; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 22:16:20 -0700 Message-Id: <01BE65C3.77621FA0@DAD> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 22:16:19 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Roger Sabin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Global Address Book MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-To: "'Pine Mail List'" X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We have not been able to figure out how to make the global address book = work in Pine. It always shows as being read only or un-readable. Any = ideas? Roger Sabin rasabin@worldnet.att.net -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 08:16:32 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:16:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA08407 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:16:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA19053; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:16:25 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA16355; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:12:24 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA29228 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:07:26 -0800 Received: from webster (webster.vetri.com [198.153.135.140]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA25129 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:07:26 -0800 Received: from spike by webster (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA12284; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:11:04 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:11:29 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Shawn Jeffries To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Global Address Book In-Reply-To: <01BE65C3.77621FA0@DAD> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: ujefsh81@spike X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Well, a global addressbook is always read-only. Are you trying to set a shared personal addressbook, where people can make changes to it? What version of Pine are you using? And what operating system? Give us more info and maybe we can help. -- Shawn Jeffries ujefsh81@vetri.com On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Roger Sabin wrote: >We have not been able to figure out how to make the global address book work in Pine. It always shows as being read only or un-readable. Any ideas? > >Roger Sabin >rasabin@worldnet.att.net From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 08:39:41 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:39:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA08752 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:39:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA24617; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:39:37 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA16370; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:36:13 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA37444 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:33:27 -0800 Received: from earlham.edu (YANG.EARLHAM.EDU [159.28.1.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA23396 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:33:26 -0800 Received: from oemcompute (LEVTOMA.EARLHAM.EARLHAM.EDU [159.28.165.165]) by earlham.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA19874 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:32:57 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <001a01be6633$73e1dda0$a5a51c9f@oemcompute.earlham.edu> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:37:58 -0000 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "M Lev-Tov" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: other email readers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01BE6633.73C973A0" X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01BE6633.73C973A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is there any way that I can view my mail using Eudora (ie how do I find = out what my pop address is? ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01BE6633.73C973A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is there any way that I can view my mail using = Eudora (ie how=20 do I find out what my pop address is?
 
------=_NextPart_000_0017_01BE6633.73C973A0-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 08:54:55 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:54:55 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA09230 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:54:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA20105; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:54:51 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA17098; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:51:42 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA17992 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:48:17 -0800 Received: from supreme.crt.state.vt.us (supreme.crt.state.vt.us [159.105.65.8]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA32193 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:48:16 -0800 Received: (from richard@localhost) by supreme.crt.state.vt.us (8.8.5/SCO5) id LAA16804 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:52:05 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199903041652.LAA16804@supreme.crt.state.vt.us> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:52:05 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Richard Longwell" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: global addressbook MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I understand that you can have a global addressbook for pine users, and that in addition, users can have their own personal addressbook. How do you set up the global pine addressbook, and in what format is it? can we copy our existing ELM systemwide addressbook to pine's? -- ******************************************** * Richard Longwell * * Judicial Systems Technical Specialist * * Research & Info Services * * Voice phone: (802) 828-4785 * * * * Send email to: * * richard@supreme.crt.state.vt.us * ******************************************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 12:16:14 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:16:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA13200 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:16:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA30617; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:16:10 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id MAA05928; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:11:48 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA39678 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:08:03 -0800 Received: from beta.tricity.wsu.edu (beta.tricity.wsu.edu [192.31.216.9]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA06401 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:08:02 -0800 Received: from [192.220.202.4] (birdy.tricity.wsu.edu [192.220.202.4]) by beta.tricity.wsu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA28177 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:08:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 12:08:00 -0800 Reply-To: richarde@tricity.wsu.edu Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Richard Eisenman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: 'cannot write to addbook.lu...' problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authenticated: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN With the latest version of Pine, I'm having trouble getting the 'cannot write to addbook.lu... using temporary file...' message to go away, with respect to global address books. I've rebuilt the indexes as root with no effect. The old version (3.96) didn't have this problem. Any suggestions? Richard Eisenman Supervisor, Computing and Telecommunications W.S.U. Tri-Cities http://www.tricity.wsu.edu/~richarde -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 17:45:59 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:45:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA17598 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:45:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA01232; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:45:55 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id RAA22885; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:42:26 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA44234 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:37:37 -0800 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA28622 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:37:37 -0800 Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost) by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA13851 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:37:36 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:37:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: 'cannot write to addbook.lu...' problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Did you rebuild it as root using the new version of pine? -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Richard Eisenman wrote: > With the latest version of Pine, I'm having trouble getting the 'cannot write > to addbook.lu... using temporary file...' message to go away, with respect to > global address books. I've rebuilt the indexes as root with no effect. The > old version (3.96) didn't have this problem. Any suggestions? > > Richard Eisenman > Supervisor, Computing and Telecommunications > W.S.U. Tri-Cities > http://www.tricity.wsu.edu/~richarde > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Thu Mar 4 21:56:38 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:56:38 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA10900 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:56:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA05077; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:56:34 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id VAA09625; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:53:51 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA31720 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:50:18 -0800 Received: from mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.39]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA20864 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:50:18 -0800 Received: from DAD ([12.72.35.47]) by mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07 118 124) with SMTP id <19990305055013.DVAN15087@DAD> for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 05:50:13 +0000 Received: by DAD with Microsoft Mail id <01BE6691.7E12B980@DAD>; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 22:51:08 -0700 Message-Id: <01BE6691.7E12B980@DAD> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 22:51:07 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Roger Sabin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: Global Address Book MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-To: "'Pine Mail List'" X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN No, we are not trying to setup a shared personal addressbook. We want to = setup a shared global addressbook that contains the e-mail addresses of = everyone in the company. We have not found a way yet to put addresses = into the global addressbook. How do you setup a shared global = addressbook? We are using Pine 4.05 on an AIX system. Roger Sabin rasabin@worldnet.att.net -----Original Message----- From: Shawn Jeffries [SMTP:ujefsh81@vetri.com] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 1999 9:11 AM To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Global Address Book Well, a global addressbook is always read-only. Are you trying to set a shared personal addressbook, where people can = make changes to it? What version of Pine are you using? And what operating system? Give us more info and maybe we can help. --=20 Shawn Jeffries ujefsh81@vetri.com On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Roger Sabin wrote: >We have not been able to figure out how to make the global address book work in Pine. It always shows as being read only or un-readable. Any = ideas? > >Roger Sabin >rasabin@worldnet.att.net From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Fri Mar 5 10:20:25 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:20:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA00341 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA22526; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:20:21 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id KAA02826; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:15:00 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA37516 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:07:59 -0800 Received: from webster (webster.vetri.com [198.153.135.140]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id KAA18551 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:07:58 -0800 Received: from spike by webster (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA02382; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 13:11:40 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 13:12:07 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Shawn Jeffries To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: Global Address Book In-Reply-To: <01BE6691.7E12B980@DAD> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: ujefsh81@spike X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN There is no difference between global and normal addressbooks other than the fact that Pine considers global addressbooks read-only and personal addressbooks as writeable (normal file permissions allowing). Look here (http://www.washington.edu/pine/tech-notes/low-level.html#addrbook) for more information. The best way I've found to do it is to run Pine as root and set up a normal addressbook under a location readable by everyone. Add your addresses to it. Make sure the permissions on that file are set to read only (so noone can change them without being root). Then specify this file for your users as their global addressbook. One problem, which may or may not affect you, is that 4.05 and 4.04 did have a bug when setting up a global addressbook. Get 4.10 just in case. -- Shawn Jeffries ujefsh81@vetri.com On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Roger Sabin wrote: >No, we are not trying to setup a shared personal addressbook. We want to setup a shared global addressbook that contains the e-mail addresses of everyone in the company. We have not found a way yet to put addresses into the global addressbook. How do you setup a shared global addressbook? We are using Pine 4.05 on an AIX system. > >Roger Sabin >rasabin@worldnet.att.net From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Fri Mar 5 11:12:53 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:12:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA01758 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:12:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA23941; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:12:48 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id LAA02728; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:08:45 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA17460 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:05:04 -0800 Received: from q7.q7.com (joey@q7.q7.com [206.58.126.2]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA27168 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:05:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (joey@localhost) by q7.q7.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA20544 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:05:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:05:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Joe Pruett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: role issues In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN is there any reason that the # (compose with role) command is not enabled in the index window? also, if you configure a role that gets settings from another role it doesn't seem to work right for the # command (doesn't set the from line for example). i haven't tested all other uses of the role, so it may be more widespread than that. another role concept that might be nice is to set the default domain to tack onto addresses in the to/cc/bcc fields. when i'm sending mail from joey@foo.com, i'd like to be able to just type bar and get bar@foo.com. but so far, people are loving the role additions. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Fri Mar 5 11:22:14 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:22:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA01909 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:22:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA24184; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:22:10 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id LAA03563; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:19:06 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA38802 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:12:51 -0800 Received: from smtp.gospelcom.net (smtp.gospelcom.net [204.253.132.6]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id LAA29427 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:12:51 -0800 Received: (qmail 12024 invoked from network); 5 Mar 1999 14:12:50 -0500 Received: from jabbok.gospelcom.net (HELO tarsus.gf.gospelcom.net) (204.253.132.4) by smtp.gospelcom.net with SMTP; 5 Mar 1999 14:12:50 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:02:49 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Topher To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: role issues In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Joe Pruett X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: topher@tarsus.gf.gospelcom.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > another role concept that might be nice is to set the default domain to > tack onto addresses in the to/cc/bcc fields. when i'm sending mail from > joey@foo.com, i'd like to be able to just type bar and get bar@foo.com. Check out the user-domain field in the config stuff. It's third from the top I think. Topher Tech Support topher@gospelcom.net Gospel Communications Network From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sat Mar 6 00:15:13 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:15:11 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA11948 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:15:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA01379; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:15:05 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP id AAA09719; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:12:54 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA31624 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:09:39 -0800 Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA10454 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:09:39 -0800 Received: from 1stpc.org (a147.ccgnv.net [207.141.129.147]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id AAA05931 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:09:38 -0800 Received: from luomat.peak.org [207.141.129.69] by 1stpc.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.04) id A300A11A00C4; Sat, 06 Mar 1999 03:10:40 EST Received: by luomat.peak.org (8.9.3/8.9.0) id DAA12181 for pine-info@cac.washington.edu; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 03:09:35 -0500 (GMT-0500) Message-Id: <199903060809.DAA12181@ocalhost> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 03:09:32 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Timothy J Luoma To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Roles Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Image-URL: http://www.peak.org/~luomat/luomat@peak.org.tiff X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN preface -- my new ISP has no (functional) newsfeed at this point, so I find myself in the ironic position of asking a more user-end question on this list. I'm confused regarding roles. I have this role setup for Usenet (which I assume will work someday, but am not holding my breath), should be used for all usenet postings: Nickname = post To pattern = >From pattern = Sender pattern = Cc pattern = News pattern = . Subject pattern = Initialize settings using role : Set From = Timothy J Luoma Set Fcc = usenet-posts Set Signature = ~/sigs/usenet Set Template = OK, now I go to compose and enter "comp.mail.pine" in the Newsgroups line and expect the rest of that information to be used, since I have a role defined for any news with a group "." This doesn't happen. Same with this for email (not news) Nickname = ap To pattern = joe@shmoe.org >From pattern = Sender pattern = Cc pattern = News pattern = Subject pattern = Initialize settings using role : Set From = jim@jim.org Set Fcc = Set Signature = Set Template = I send an email to compose and enter "joe@shmoe.org" and expect that the Role will be set to "jim@jim.org" Why isn't this so? I even tried starting pine with pine joe@shmoe.org and that didn't seem to work. TjL -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Mon Mar 8 08:08:27 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:08:27 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA18320 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA13322; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:08:24 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA13145; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:03:25 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA31544 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 07:58:53 -0800 Received: from vision.tigerteam.net (root@vision.tigerteam.net [206.69.128.146]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA00841 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 07:58:52 -0800 Received: from vision.tigerteam.net (andy@vision.tigerteam.net [206.69.128.146]) by vision.tigerteam.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA09232 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:57:43 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:57:43 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Andy Walden To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Hashed Mail Spool MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: andy@vision.tigerteam.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I searched the archives for the answer to this, but couldn't find a definitive answer. I want to modify pine to work on a system that has the incoming mail spooled in $HOME/.mail. I have been toying with the src and config files, but haven't gotten the results I need. Suggestions? Thanks for the time. -andy -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Andy Walden Work Email: andy@mtco.com. Network Administrator, Pers Email: andy@netimagination.com. MTCO Communications Phone: (800) 859-6826 " Reality is just Chaos with better lighting. " -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Mon Mar 8 08:24:27 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:24:24 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA19120 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:24:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA13874; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:24:18 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA13915; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:19:57 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA43450 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:17:11 -0800 Received: from numen.elon.edu (numen.elon.edu [152.33.3.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA27800 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:17:09 -0800 Received: from localhost (rose@localhost) by numen.elon.edu (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id LAA18775 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:14:56 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:14:56 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Tony Rose To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine Alternatives ??? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We run Pine at our college and it gets its fair share of complaints and then some. People want GUI and that is that. I have been searching for some alternatives to satisfy these requests. POP3 is up and working and it satisfies some people, but others want to be able to share calenders, and some complain about the password not protecting their folders with POP3. Is there a GUI program that will authenticate at the login that would replace Pine? Or am I going to have to go to a MSExchange world to meet these demands? Any help/info is appreciated ________________________________ Tony Rose Elon College Email Administrator E: rose@elon.edu V: (336)538-6815 F: (336)584-2447 Campus Box 2400 Elon College, NC 27244 ________________________________ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Mon Mar 8 08:47:33 1999 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:47:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA20308 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA14616; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:47:28 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA14860; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:43:23 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA44254 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:40:14 -0800 Received: from violet.csi.cam.ac.uk (violet.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.58]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA31564 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:40:11 -0800 Received: from quinag.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.10.53] helo=cam.ac.uk) by violet.csi.cam.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 2.05 #3) id 10K34W-0003cp-00 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:40:04 +0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:45:54 +0000 (GMT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Barry Landy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine Alternatives ??? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: bl10@imap.hermes.cam.ac.uk X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Mulberry Netscape 4.5 among others On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Tony Rose wrote: :> :>We run Pine at our college and it gets its fair share of complaints and :>then some. People want GUI and that is that. I have been searching for :>some alternatives to satisfy these requests. POP3 is up and working and it :>satisfies some people, but others want to be able to share calenders, and :>some complain about the password not protecting their folders with POP3. :> :>Is there a GUI program that will authenticate at the login that would :>replace Pine? Or am I going to have to go to a MSExchange world to meet :>these demands? :> :>Any help/info is appreciated :> :>________________________________ :>Tony Rose :>Elon College Email Administrator :> :>E: rose@elon.edu :>V: (336)538-6815 :>F: (336)584-2447 :> :>Campus Box 2400 :>Elon College, NC 27244 :>________________________________ :> :>-- :>----------------------------------------------------------------- :> For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: :> http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ :>----------------------------------------------------------------- :> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry Landy Computer Laboratory:+44 1223 334600 Head of Systems and Development Direct line: +44 1223 334713 University of Cambridge Computing Service New Museums Site Email:bl10@cam.ac.uk Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QG From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:49:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA17910 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:49:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA14672; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:49:13 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA14978; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:45:52 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA22046 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:43:37 -0800 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA09819 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:43:37 -0800 Received: from D-140-142-110-210.dhcp.washington.edu (D-140-142-110-210.dhcp.washington.edu [140.142.110.210]) by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA26597; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:43:30 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:42:29 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Terry Gray To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine Alternatives ??? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Tony Rose X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gray@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Tony, You need to refine your question a bit more. If you are talking about native desktop mailers, there are lots of choices for *mail* functionality, including NS Messenger, MS Outlook Express, Cyrusoft Mulberry, and even PC-Pine (which may look a bit homely, but has most all the GUI amenities). If you are talking about a mailer for use on timesharing systems, there are a few X-based mailers you could consider. I would strongly recommend you stick with an IMAP solution rather than focusing on POP, however. (All of the mailers mentioned above support both.) See www.imap.org for a list of products. Calendaring is a problem. Lots of people like MS Outlook calendaring and because Exchange appears to be a monolithic "take it all or leave it" design, you are then forced to use Exchange for not only calendaring but email. (At least that's what we've been told by multiple MS folks.) However, we have recently discovered that Outlook can export a free-busy list that can form the basis of a server-less calendaring system. (All the f-b lists are "published" say via http and are accessible to each client.) The latest Lotus Organizer also supports the same model. This model allows you to use whatever IMAP/POP server you prefer, and avoids having to maintain a calendaring server (a class of beast which some have found problematic.) -teg On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Tony Rose wrote: > We run Pine at our college and it gets its fair share of complaints and > then some. People want GUI and that is that. I have been searching for > some alternatives to satisfy these requests. POP3 is up and working and it > satisfies some people, but others want to be able to share calenders, and > some complain about the password not protecting their folders with POP3. > > Is there a GUI program that will authenticate at the login that would > replace Pine? Or am I going to have to go to a MSExchange world to meet > these demands? From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:06:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA26179 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA22092; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:06:43 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id MAA07914; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 12:59:41 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA31390 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 12:56:44 -0800 Received: from mail1.new-york.net (SYSTEM@mail1.new-york.net [165.254.2.54]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA19993 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 12:56:43 -0800 Received: from aleph.ii.com ("port 1149"@aleph.ii.com) by mail1.new-york.net (PMDF V5.1-10 #22885) with ESMTP id <01J8LD5KO2II000H40@mail1.new-york.net> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:56:28 -0500 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 15:55:37 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: bug adding incoming folder MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ii@shell13.ba.best.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN If I go to my list of incoming folders and add an incoming folder using the A command, it works fine if I give the incoming folder a nickname. But if I don't give the folder a nickname, it says the folder has been created but it doesn't show up in the list. After I quit and restart Pine, it then shows up in the list. It seems like the behaviour should be the same whether you use a nickname or not. Also, in each case above I was prompted for my login and password twice. It seems like once should be enough. Thanks, Nancy -- For Pine info & links, see www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/ ŠNancy McGough http://www.ii.com Infinite Ink --= Sent via PINE: Power Internet News & Email for Win/Unix =-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:04:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA27483 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:04:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA23573; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:04:08 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id NAA11915; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:59:33 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA10000 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:56:54 -0800 Received: from snorkel.uits.indiana.edu (snorkel.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.6.186]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA20656 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:56:53 -0800 Received: from massachusetts.exchange.indiana.edu (massachusetts.exchange.indiana.edu [129.79.6.159]) by snorkel.uits.indiana.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1/regexp($Revision: 1.1 $, ([.0-9]+), 1IUPO)) with ESMTP id QAA12658 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:56:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by massachusetts.exchange.indiana.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <1LKXZY9C>; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:56:52 -0500 Message-Id: <4DDCEF49E462D21185C400805F6547DA866FE4@delaware.exchange.indiana.edu> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:56:50 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Krulewitch, Sean V" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: possible bug, selecting folders MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN When the following option is not enabled (this is the default), on cannot select a folder using ctrl-T separate-folder-and-directory-entries -Sean -- Sean V. Krulewitch -KB9KJN- Indiana University Information Technology Services Messaging Team Senior Messaging Specialist/Software Engineer krulewit@indiana.edu 812-855-8858 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:45:02 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA30442 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:45:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA27846; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:44:59 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id QAA18833; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:39:46 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA34378 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:57:56 -0800 Received: from loki.cscorp.com (loki.cscorp.com [209.76.112.241]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA22648 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:57:55 -0800 Received: from localhost by loki.cscorp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20143; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:56:39 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:56:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Russell Van Tassell To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine Alternatives ??? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Tony Rose X-Cc: mutt-users@mutt.org, Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Tony Rose wrote: > Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:14:56 -0500 (EST) > From: Tony Rose > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Pine Alternatives ??? > > [...] > > Is there a GUI program that will authenticate at the login that would > replace Pine? Or am I going to have to go to a MSExchange world to meet > these demands? > > Any help/info is appreciated Platform specification would be nice, but... *shrug* Personally, I like Mutt and tend to use it at work... changeable key bindings, color xterm support, message threading, filder hooks... quite a bit of "what's best in other mailers." Though it seems to miss good multiple incoming folder support and roles (though I still feel some- what "new" to it). http://www.mutt.org/ Russell -- Russell M. Van Tassell russell@cscorp.com From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 22:24:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA00095 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 22:24:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA05415; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 22:24:36 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id WAA03293; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 22:22:40 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA34914 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 22:20:05 -0800 Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA01243 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 22:20:05 -0800 Received: from 1stpc.org (a147.ccgnv.net [207.141.129.147]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id WAA00752 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 22:20:01 -0800 Received: from luomat.peak.org [207.141.129.66] by 1stpc.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.04) id ADE2D8720112; Tue, 09 Mar 1999 01:21:22 EST Received: by luomat.peak.org (8.9.3/8.9.0) id BAA05344 for pine-info@cac.washington.edu; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 01:19:58 -0500 (GMT-0500) Message-Id: <199903090619.BAA05344@ocalhost> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 01:19:56 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Timothy J Luoma To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: removing confirmation of post Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Image-URL: http://www.peak.org/~luomat/luomat@peak.org.tiff X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This seems to be the code I would remove from send.c to make PINE stop asking me "Posted message may go to thousands of readers. Really post?" /* --- If posting, confirm with user ----*/ if(outgoing->newsgroups && *outgoing->newsgroups && want_to(POST_PMT, 'n', 'n', NO_HELP, WT_NORM) == 'n'){ q_status_message(SM_ORDER, 0, 3, "Message not posted"); dprint(4, (debugfile, "no post, continuing\n")); continue; } Is there any "gotcha" to removing this code? TjL -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:07:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA01036 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:07:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA05965; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:07:10 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP id XAA18441; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:04:46 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA49192 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:02:10 -0800 Received: from bru-noc.net (root@satanas.bru-noc.net [195.74.192.146]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA01600 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:02:09 -0800 Received: from satanas.bru-noc.net (satanas.bru-noc.net [195.74.192.146]) by bru-noc.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA16526 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:02:09 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:02:07 +0100 (MET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Xavier Mertens To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine & Solaris CDE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi *, I would like to be able to use my mouse with pine 4.10. Environment: Solaris + CDE Problem: the mouse is always used as in "select text" mode. How can I do that? X -- Visit: http://3276456082 | ICQ: 8398489 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:20:56 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA10794 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA14296; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:20:52 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA17142; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:17:34 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA45958 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:13:49 -0800 Received: from mail.cs.byu.edu (mail.cs.byu.edu [128.187.101.9]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA10093 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:13:47 -0800 Received: from supreme.cs.byu.edu (1004@supreme.cs.byu.edu [128.187.101.59]) by mail.cs.byu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA14632 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 09:13:30 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199903091613.JAA14632@mail.cs.byu.edu> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 09:29:30 -0700 (MST) Reply-To: Fred Clift Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Fred Clift To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: problem with pine hanging.... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: ElAs1ssnB/M/kbiU0b9EwA== X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm runing pine 4.05 under solaris and hpux. Pine's global conf file is set to log in to a local imap server by default, so that when you start pine, it prompts for username and password. Up until recently, this worked just fine, but now pine seems to hang for a little less than a minute before presenting the log in prompt. After that all works fine, but it's very annoying to wait 1 minute to read email... (other imap clients ie dtmail under solaris dont have this problem -- they connect right away... And pine exhibits this problem under both platforms, solaris and hpux...) So, I started up pine with verbose debugging (pine -d 9) and then watch the .pine-debug1 file with tail -f. Eventually after pine reads all the config files, I get to a point where it does the following About to open folder "INBOX" inbox: "INBOX" busy_alarm(1, Opening "INBOX", 0, 1) q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" ) output_message(Opening "INBOX" ) STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 SIGCHLD raised alarm_signal() alarm_signal() alarm_signal() alarm_signal() alarm_signal() .... During the 'pause' in pine, one of these alarm_signal() lines per second, approximately, appears... Eventually ... alarm_signal() IMAP 14:42:19 3/8 mm_log babble: Trying IP address [MY-IP_DELETED] IMAP DEBUG 14:42:20 3/8: * OK MAILSERVER.hostname.deleted IMAP4rev1 Service 9.0(159) at Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:26:28 -0700 (MST) (Report problems in this server to MRC@CAC.Wash ington.EDU) (note that I changed the IP and hostname of the mail server so spambots wont pick em out of this message) Any ideas what gives? I'm about to download the code and start editing the configuration files that end in .c ... if you know what I mean... I just heard a report from another user that ocasionally any remote folder write is very slow for him -- kind of bursty -- dont know if this problem is realted. -- Fred Clift - fred@cs.byu.edu Systems Manager - Computer Science - BYU Remember: if brute force doesn't work, you're just not using enough. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:25:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA24141 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:25:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA01556; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:25:36 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id WAA27049; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:24:08 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA24346 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:20:15 -0800 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA07887 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:20:14 -0800 Received: from d-bm4-0a.ppp.op.net (octorock@d-bm4-0a.ppp.op.net [209.152.194.106]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.18 $) with ESMTP id BAA08151 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:20:13 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:25:35 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: szale@doubtful.com Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: szalemandre To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: heirarchical directories and non-incoming mail folder collections MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: octorock@juggler X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN i have two problems, but they can both be solved with either of one action: why can't i set up heirarchical directories of message folders in my incoming collection? and why can't tab simply search ALL folders in all directories and in all collections for new mail? it seems stupid to allow tab'ing through folders if it can only be done on folders within the incoming collection. AND, it seems stupid to allow hierachical directories anywhere EXCEPT in the incoming collection. it would make sense for both problems to be fixed, but even if only one is fixed, i'd be happy. OR: is there a workaround? any help would be appreciated, thanks, -eric --- eric sherman szale@doubtful.com doubtful productions www.doubtful.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:32:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA14414 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:32:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA10641; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:32:44 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id KAA18522; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:28:36 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA31970 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:25:06 -0800 Received: from sass165.sandia.gov (mailgate.sandia.gov [132.175.109.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA09800 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:25:06 -0800 Received: from sasg829.sandia.gov (sasg829.sandia.gov [134.253.226.190]) by sass165.sandia.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA23849 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:25:04 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:23:26 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Daniel Sands To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: problem with pine hanging.... In-Reply-To: <199903091613.JAA14632@mail.cs.byu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Over here, this was due to the network taking a VERY long time to figure out that RSH was not permitted. Pine first tries to RSH to the mail machine and run rimapd to bypass sending your name and password over the network in the clear. When this fails, it falls back to normal IMAP. I guess one possible reason for this is a firewall that drops RSH packets. I had to tell it not to use RSH. In file c-client/tcp_unix.c, change line 41 to: static long rshtimeout = 0; /* rsh timeout */ Note: If "rshtimeout" is not on line 41, use the line that it is on, and change its value to 0. On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Fred Clift wrote: > I'm runing pine 4.05 under solaris and hpux. Pine's global conf file > is set to log in to a local imap server by default, so that when you > start pine, it prompts for username and password. > > Up until recently, this worked just fine, but now pine seems to hang > for a little less than a minute before presenting the log in prompt. > After that all works fine, but it's very annoying to wait 1 minute to > read email... > > (other imap clients ie dtmail under solaris dont have this problem -- > they connect right away... And pine exhibits this problem under both > platforms, solaris and hpux...) From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:14:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA06022 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA12006; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:14:13 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id LAA14280; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:08:53 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA26244 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:04:18 -0800 Received: from mean.netppl.fi (mean.netppl.fi [195.242.208.16]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA11710 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:04:16 -0800 Received: from ppp-210138.dial.netppl.fi (ppp-210138.dial.netppl.fi [195.242.210.138]) by mean.netppl.fi (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA01114; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 21:04:12 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:57:46 +0000 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Juhani Sivusalo To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: problem with pine hanging.... In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum , Daniel Sands X-Sender: jasivu@JSFalcon X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Daniel Sands wrote: > Over here, this was due to the network taking a VERY long time to figure out > that RSH was not permitted. > > I had to tell it not to use RSH. In file c-client/tcp_unix.c, change line 41 > to: > static long rshtimeout = 0; /* rsh timeout */ > > Note: If "rshtimeout" is not on line 41, use the line that it is on, and > change its value to 0. Or fix 'rsh-open-timeout=0' .pinerc in home directory. It should disable rsh. -- Juhani Sivusalo E-Mail: jasivu@na.netppl.fi Oulu, Finland http://www.netppl.fi/~jasivu/ phone: +358-8-520 8523 GSM: +358-400-582 546 From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:34:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA06828 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:34:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA12653; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:34:49 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id LAA15546; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:27:13 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA46828 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:24:21 -0800 Received: from sass165.sandia.gov (mailgate.sandia.gov [132.175.109.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA15095 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:24:21 -0800 Received: from sasg829.sandia.gov (sasg829.sandia.gov [134.253.226.190]) by sass165.sandia.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03440 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:24:18 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <77349FC5DC1CD211BAD900805FA7241A04941A06-100000@es01snlnt.sandia.gov> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:22:41 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Daniel Sands To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: problem with pine hanging.... In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Juhani Sivusalo wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Daniel Sands wrote: > > > Over here, this was due to the network taking a VERY long time to figure out > > that RSH was not permitted. > > > > I had to tell it not to use RSH. In file c-client/tcp_unix.c, change line 41 > > to: > > static long rshtimeout = 0; /* rsh timeout */ > > > > Note: If "rshtimeout" is not on line 41, use the line that it is on, and > > change its value to 0. > > Or fix 'rsh-open-timeout=0' .pinerc in home directory. > It should disable rsh. That would work for one user. Would be better to store that in the pine.conf file. From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:05:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA09915 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:05:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA21525; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:05:13 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id OAA24648; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:01:59 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA37502 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:58:59 -0800 Received: from mail.cs.byu.edu (IDENT:0@mail.cs.byu.edu [128.187.101.9]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA21513 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:58:57 -0800 Received: from supreme.cs.byu.edu (1004@supreme.cs.byu.edu [128.187.101.59]) by mail.cs.byu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA15952; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:58:36 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199903102158.OAA15952@mail.cs.byu.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:14:50 -0700 (MST) Reply-To: Fred Clift Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Fred Clift To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: problem with pine hanging.... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: qUu6j5uHIQXcuaVjJdhRUA== X-To: dnsands@sandia.gov X-Cc: pine-info@u.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN >Over here, this was due to the network taking a VERY long time to figure out >that RSH was not permitted. Pine first tries to RSH to the mail This was exactly the problem. Inetd config change to not allow rsh. Thanks for the help. Incidentally, there is a config option that specifies how long imap should wait before using normal imap logins and setting it to zero fixed my problem. --> fred From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:49:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA19032 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:49:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA29467; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:49:50 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id BAA25808; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:47:50 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA19840 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:44:57 -0800 Received: from cauda.caput.dk (IDENT:morten@[194.182.253.164]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA23212 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:44:56 -0800 Received: from localhost (morten@localhost) by cauda.caput.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA30327 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:44:08 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:44:08 +0000 ( ) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Morten Primdahl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Two news servers, how do I post? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: PINE-Info X-Authentication-Warning: cauda.caput.dk: morten owned process doing -bs X-Sender: morten@cauda.caput.dk X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi I've set up pine to use 2 news servers, I can open the groups at both servers and read from both, but only post to one. I reckon that when I try to post a message in a group on server B, PINE 'thinks' I'm trying to post it via server A and I get an 'Unknown news group'. Following is from my .pinerc nntp-server=news.tele.dk, news.sslug.dk news-collections=News {news.tele.dk/nntp}#news.[tele.*], SSLUG {news.sslug.dk/nntp}#news.[sslug.*] What else do I need to be able to post as I please without having to change nntp-server in the PINE config? Thanks in advance Morten -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:28:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA30311 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:28:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA08415; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:28:27 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id LAA12869; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:23:21 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA21164 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:19:35 -0800 Received: from mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA (mcmail.CIS.McMaster.CA [130.113.20.6]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA15780 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:19:34 -0800 Received: from localhost (pinevers@localhost) by mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA25992; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:19:30 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:19:30 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Pine Versions To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.10 problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Cc: Jessie Kleefstra , Brian Beckberger X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We have just upgraded one of our unix office servers to Pine 4.10. So far everything seems to work fine but one thing. When 2 sessions of Pine are open by the same id, the second session is put into 'read only'. The tech notes under folder locking leads us to believe that the second session will put the first session in read only. Pine 3.96 works this way which it should be. Are we doing something wrong or is this a bug? Because if this is the case then there will be problems if the first session of Pine was aborted somehow and then the person logged on again. They will not be able to do anything until the first session times out. We are running Solaris 2.6 on a Sun machine. We did a Build with DEBUG='' and so5 parameters. When you reply, would you please also include the 'cc'? Thanks ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jessie Kleefstra E-Mail:kleefstr@offsv1.cis.mcmaster.ca Sr.Consultant, Helpdesk Services helpline@mcmaster.ca Computing & Information Services Phone: (905) 525-9140 ext. 24357 McMaster University, ABB-132 Fax: (905) 528-3773 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:23:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA23713 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA11349; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:23:48 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id NAA12575; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:13:05 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA19202 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:43:34 -0800 Received: from beta.tricity.wsu.edu (beta.tricity.wsu.edu [192.31.216.9]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA28510 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:43:33 -0800 Received: from localhost (richarde@localhost) by beta.tricity.wsu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA27870; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:43:13 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:43:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Richard L. Eisenman" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.10 problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Versions X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We've noticed the same problem with 4.10 under DU. We'd also like to know how to work around this. On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Pine Versions wrote: > > > We have just upgraded one of our unix office servers to Pine 4.10. So far > everything seems to work fine but one thing. When 2 sessions of Pine are > open by the same id, the second session is put into 'read only'. The tech > notes under folder locking leads us to believe that the second session > will put the first session in read only. Pine 3.96 works this way which it > should be. > Are we doing something wrong or is this a bug? Because if this is the case > then there will be problems if the first session of Pine was aborted > somehow and then the person logged on again. They will not be able to do > anything until the first session times out. > We are running Solaris 2.6 on a Sun machine. We did a Build with DEBUG='' > and so5 parameters. > When you reply, would you please also include the 'cc'? > > Thanks > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jessie Kleefstra E-Mail:kleefstr@offsv1.cis.mcmaster.ca > Sr.Consultant, Helpdesk Services helpline@mcmaster.ca > Computing & Information Services Phone: (905) 525-9140 ext. 24357 > McMaster University, ABB-132 Fax: (905) 528-3773 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > Richard Eisenman Supervisor, Computing and Telecommunications W.S.U. Tri-Cities, CIC 225E Office (509) 372-7381 Fax (509) 372-7281 richarde@tricity.wsu.edu http://www2.tricity.wsu.edu/richardeisenman http:///www2.tricity.wsu.edu/ctc From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:44:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA32215 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:44:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA16237; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:44:41 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id NAA24231; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:36:30 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA19294 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:29:34 -0800 Received: from pump2.york.ac.uk (pump2.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.12]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA00339 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:29:33 -0800 Received: from pippin.york.ac.uk (pippin.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.9]) by pump2.york.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA07187; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:29:31 GMT Message-Id: <2839241.3130176571@pippin.york.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:29:31 +0000 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Mike Brudenell To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.10 problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Cc: "Richard L. Eisenman" X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This was asked (and answered) a week or two back in this same forum. Apparently it is a (now!) known bug in the Pine 4.10 kit. It will be fixed in the next release. If you are willing to build the programs from scratch then you can fix your Pine and IMAP daemon as follows: 1. Grab the latest IMAP kit (which is separate from the Pine kit). 2. Build this: it will give you a fixed C-client library and a fixed IMAP daemon. 3. Rebuild your Pine, linking it against the above C-client library rather than the one from the Pine kit. Test/install the rebuilt IMAP daemon and Pine executables. Cheers, Mike B-) -- The Computing Service, University of York, Heslington, York Yo10 5DD, UK Tel: +44-1904-433811 FAX: +44-1904-433740 http://www.york.ac.uk/~pmb1/ * Unsolicited commercial e-mail is NOT welcome at this e-mail address. * --On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 12:43 pm -0800 "Richard L. Eisenman" wrote: > We've noticed the same problem with 4.10 under DU. We'd also like to > know how to work around this. > > On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Pine Versions wrote: > >> We have just upgraded one of our unix office servers to Pine 4.10. So >> far everything seems to work fine but one thing. When 2 sessions of >> Pine are open by the same id, the second session is put into 'read >> only'. The tech notes under folder locking leads us to believe that the >> second session will put the first session in read only. Pine 3.96 works >> this way which it should be. >> Are we doing something wrong or is this a bug? Because if this is the >> case then there will be problems if the first session of Pine was >> aborted somehow and then the person logged on again. They will not be >> able to do anything until the first session times out. >> We are running Solaris 2.6 on a Sun machine. We did a Build with >> DEBUG='' and so5 parameters. >> When you reply, would you please also include the 'cc'? >> >> Thanks >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------ Jessie Kleefstra >> E-Mail:kleefstr@offsv1.cis.mcmaster.ca Sr.Consultant, Helpdesk Services >> helpline@mcmaster.ca Computing & Information Services Phone: (905) >> 525-9140 ext. 24357 McMaster University, ABB-132 Fax: (905) >> 528-3773 >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------- > > Richard Eisenman > Supervisor, Computing and Telecommunications > W.S.U. Tri-Cities, CIC 225E > Office (509) 372-7381 > Fax (509) 372-7281 > richarde@tricity.wsu.edu > http://www2.tricity.wsu.edu/richardeisenman > http:///www2.tricity.wsu.edu/ctc From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:06:27 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA32692 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:06:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA16998; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:06:24 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id NAA16233; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:57:04 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA14282 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:53:48 -0800 Received: from dns2.clubi.net (news.clubi.net [204.216.215.3]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA07820 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:53:47 -0800 Received: from coolguy (coolguy.phaetonic.cx [204.216.215.97]) by dns2.clubi.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id NAA00623 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:49:50 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <003401be6c0a$1c203c60$61d7d8cc@coolguy.phaetonic.cx> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:57:07 -0800 Reply-To: "System Administrator" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "System Administrator" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine 4.10 and ipop3d MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I was looking all over the source for a section that refers to "port 110 service init from IP"...and can't find it. I want to remove this as on a busy pop3 server this causes a bunch of un-necessary log entries. Would anyone know file I need to modify? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:07:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id CAA09185 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:07:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id CAA28967; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:07:42 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id CAA09699; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:05:55 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id CAA45214 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:03:06 -0800 Received: from ibadan.skannet.com (root@[212.100.64.63]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id CAA18401 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:03:00 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ibadan.skannet.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with UUCP id KAA22346 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:44:23 +0100 Received: (from charly@localhost) by niprd.anpa.net.ng (8.6.12/8.6.9) id KAA00205; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:36:42 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:36:42 +0100 (GMT+0100) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Charles Balogun To: Pine Discussion Forum MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Attention: Pine Discussion Forum For the past three (3) days I have received e-mails up to 10 some of which are addressed to Pine Discussion Forum and some reply to individuals. Please I need a clarification on this. Or is this supposed to be the Pine Frequently Asked Questions list, which I requested for? Anticipating to hear from you. Charles B. NIPRD, Abuja. Nigeria. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:37:24 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA09294 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:37:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA05932; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:37:18 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id WAA25449; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:21:02 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA28166 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:16:59 -0800 Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA24159 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:16:59 -0800 Received: from taxa.psyc.missouri.edu (taxa.psyc.missouri.edu [128.206.45.83]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id WAA01833 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:16:58 -0800 Received: from localhost by taxa.psyc.missouri.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id AAA07383; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:16:49 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:16:49 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Mike Miller To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: use of pine with dtterm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: PINE-INFO list X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Pine and Pico can be set to use the mouse to move the cursor and perform other operations in an xterm window. Is it possible to get similar behavior in other window environments? Especially dtterm? Regards, Mike -- Michael B. Miller University of Missouri--Columbia http://taxa.psyc.missouri.edu/~mbmiller/ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:57:49 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA01304 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:57:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA00436; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:57:47 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA10424; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:54:07 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA46020 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:49:01 -0800 Received: from nimbus.anzio.com (ras@nimbus.anzio.com [204.201.253.34]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA13696 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:49:00 -0800 Received: from localhost (ras@localhost) by nimbus.anzio.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA23293; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:29:07 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:29:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Bob Rasmussen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: use of pine with dtterm In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mike Miller X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Mike Miller wrote: > Pine and Pico can be set to use the mouse to move the cursor and perform > other operations in an xterm window. Is it possible to get similar > behavior in other window environments? Especially dtterm? Our telnet program for Windows, Anzio Lite (and AnzioWin), mimics xterm's mouse protocol, and works very well with Pine/Pico. Just set a DISPLAY environment variable, to trick Pine into thinking you are running in X. Samples are available at the web site below. Regards, ....Bob Rasmussen, President, Rasmussen Software, Inc. personal e-mail: ras@anzio.com company e-mail: rsi@anzio.com or sales@anzio.com or support@anzio.com ftp://ftp.anzio.com voice: 503-624-0360 http://www.anzio.com fax: 503-624-0760 From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:29:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA06566 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:29:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA03899; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:29:19 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id NAA24843; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:25:10 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA42440 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:19:45 -0800 Received: from BudcoDM.budco.com (budcodm.budco.com [207.238.177.21]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id NAA27134 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:19:44 -0800 Received: from 1579 by BudcoDM.budco.com via SMTP (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1502/940406.SGI.AUTO) for id QAA05647; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 16:19:33 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19990315162213.00d1f250@budco.com> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 16:22:13 -0600 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Scott Wenzel To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Command level attachments Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: swenzel@budco.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there a way to use pine at the command level to include binary attachments?? I have read most of the documentation and cannot find much support on this subject. Interested in creating a shell script to send attachments to users. -Scott -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:42:10 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA07486 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA08075; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:42:08 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id NAA20846; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:38:51 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA32210 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:34:59 -0800 Received: from sass165.sandia.gov (mailgate.sandia.gov [132.175.109.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA05346 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:34:58 -0800 Received: from sasg829.sandia.gov (sasg829.sandia.gov [134.253.226.190]) by sass165.sandia.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA11455 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 14:34:56 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 14:33:20 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Daniel Sands To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Command level attachments In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19990315162213.00d1f250@budco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Have you looked at mpack? This is much better-suited for your purpose than Pine is. On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Scott Wenzel wrote: > > Is there a way to use pine at the command level to include binary > attachments?? > I have read most of the documentation and cannot find much support on this > subject. Interested in creating a shell script to send attachments to users. From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 19:24:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id TAA12569 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 19:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id TAA11916; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 19:24:39 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id TAA01455; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 19:21:31 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id TAA10052 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 19:18:35 -0800 Received: from blkbox.com (swhatley@blkbox.com [206.109.97.2]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id TAA10423 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 19:18:34 -0800 Received: from localhost (swhatley@localhost) by blkbox.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA21378; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:18:31 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:18:31 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Steven Whatley To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Command level attachments In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Daniel Sands X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Daniel Sands wrote: > Have you looked at mpack? This is much better-suited for your purpose than > Pine is. Where does one find mpack? Thanks, Steven -- _|_ | _|_ "I am the way and the truth and the life. | --|-- | No one comes to the Father except through Steven Whatley | | | me. If you really knew me, you would Houston, Texas | know my Father as well. From now on, swhatley@blkbox.com | you do know him and have seen him." http://www.blkbox.com/~swhatley/ -- Jesus Christ (John 14:6-7 NIV) From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:34:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA13336 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:34:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA12936; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:34:44 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id UAA04211; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:31:45 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA10038 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:28:44 -0800 Received: from calvin.twntpe.cdc.com (ip129179-17-10.a.cdc.com [129.179.17.10]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA26795 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:28:37 -0800 Received: from edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com by calvin.twntpe.cdc.com; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:28:29 +0800 Message-Id: <000801be6f65$58131c20$1511b381@edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:27:47 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Ed Greshko" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: Command level attachments In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Steven Whatley" X-Cc: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > Where does one find mpack? One place.... ftp.andrew.cmu.edu /pub/mpack Ed From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:41:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA05249 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA13050; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:41:20 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id UAA04476; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:37:53 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA21686 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:35:15 -0800 Received: from oa.cmbchina.com ([202.96.161.125]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id UAA18132 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:35:11 -0800 Received: from usa.net ([202.96.161.117]) by oa.cmbchina.com (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2 9-3-1997)) with SMTP id 482568B3.006172A6; Wed, 1 Apr 1970 01:44:23 +0800 Message-Id: <36EDC4B0.6112065@usa.net> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:40:49 +0800 Reply-To: shichunhui@usa.net Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: sch To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: any one explain the difference between different version? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: zh-CN X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Anyone here can explain the difference between versions of pine? 3.96 -> 4.10,or tell me where I can find the information.thanks. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:38:22 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA13506 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:38:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA13863; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:38:19 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id VAA13157; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:35:24 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA22890 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:32:37 -0800 Received: from kootcom.kootenay.net (kootcom.kootenay.net [209.52.230.1]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA00097 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:32:36 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by kootcom.kootenay.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA19238 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 05:36:39 GMT Received: from ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca by kootcom.kootenay.net; Mon, 15 Mar 99 21:36 PST Received: from localhost (jrasku@localhost) by ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA00646 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:22:25 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:22:23 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Jessica Rasku To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Intresting Feature in 4.05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This may not at all be a problem with Pine, but possibly with other systems involved. I have a friend who is using ArgoMail (web based system, with I don't really know what kind of real support behind it), but her messages come as a single line (they are sent that way), with the last line (or two) of the wraped version missing... Here is what the messages look like, more or less... From: Mrs Shoubridge To: jXXXXX@XXXXXX.com Subject: hi X-Mailer: Argomail 1.01.27 by Roger Spooner Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="PART-BOUNDARY-921012645-riws" Date: Tue Mar 9 20:50:45 1999 Message-Id: Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2 --PART-BOUNDARY-921012645-riws Content-Description: text Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable dear jessica how cute are you what do men say when you walk past them.have you been busy what clothes are you wareing.you will allways be my friend tell me about your body love steph --PART-BOUNDARY-921012645-riws-- Is there anything about it that is ``odd''. Listserv will tack on it's bottom banner after the ``--PART-BOUNDARY-921012645-riws--'' portion wihch is the end of the message by the MIME standard as I understand it. Why does Listserv not understand these messages as they are intended, and why does Pine 4.05 not understand them either? Pine ``loses'' the bottom banner that Listserv adds. It seems that 3.96 did not have any of these problems, but I could be mistaken... Jessica -- Jessica Rasku, Box 270, Rossland, B.C., V0G 1Y0, (250) 362-5701, LinuxBox: (250) 362-9668. List manager: majordomo@ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca send command help ---- To get help with majordomo or lists ---- To get a list of all lists on server. WWW: From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 23:20:43 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA09014 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 23:20:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA15312; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 23:20:40 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id XAA08652; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 23:18:54 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA21510 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 23:16:04 -0800 Received: from oa.cmbchina.com ([202.96.161.125]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id XAA00484 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 23:15:55 -0800 Received: from usa.net ([202.96.161.117]) by oa.cmbchina.com (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2 9-3-1997)) with SMTP id 4825690F.005C7245; Thu, 2 Jul 1970 00:49:46 +0800 Message-Id: <36EE0563.AAAF5A2F@usa.net> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 15:16:53 +0800 Reply-To: shichunhui@usa.net Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: sch To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: what pine can do... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: zh-CN X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have finish the build of pine3.96 on NT. I am trying to use it to send a mail or access a pop3-server to read a mail. I configured the pine, personalname : myname user-id: my mail id(the part in my mail-address before '@') user-domain: my mail server host name. smtp server :my server host name inbox path: {my mail server}INBOX, ---Then when I try to "Compose Message", it said "can't send message without an open remote fold". my mail-server offer pop3 and smtp service. so how can I just use pine as a netscape messanger? If pine can't work as a client to smtp-server and pop3-server, Is the c-client lib suitable to write a messanger-like program?Any document about the module structure of the source code? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:22:49 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA28695 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:22:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA00714; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:22:47 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id MAA10524; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:16:58 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA31270 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:12:35 -0800 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([205.146.146.240]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA08912 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:12:35 -0800 Received: from localhost by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id PAA0000004364; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 15:12:31 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 15:12:30 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: IMAP addressbooks MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Info mailing list X-Authentication-Warning: falcon.dickinson.edu: newcomer owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We're interested in using PC-Pine 4.10 but I need a way to have global IMAP addressbooks. All of the documentation I've found says that global addressbooks are, by default, read-only. Fine, however, if you try to set up an IMAP global addressbook on a PC that points to an existing IMAP addressbook on a UNIX box (read only permissions on the file), PC-Pine grips about not having write access. I'm assuming this is because of the multiple versions supported by IMAP addressbooks. However, I just want to have an addressbook out there that's readable by anyone but not writable. Is this possible? ================================================================================ Don Newcomer Dickinson College Asst. Director of Computer Services P.O. Box 1773 newcomer@dickinson.edu Carlisle, PA 17013 Phone: (717) 245-1256 FAX: (717) 245-1690 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:41:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA31032 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:41:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA04654; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:41:48 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id OAA24421; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:41:42 -0800 Received: from physics.ucla.edu (physics.ucla.edu [128.97.23.13]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA30432 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:38:32 -0800 Received: from yukawa (yukawa [128.97.22.100]) by physics.ucla.edu (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA00557 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:37:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by yukawa (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA27026; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:37:42 -0800 Message-Id: <199903162237.OAA27026@yukawa> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:37:42 -0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: xu@physics.ucla.edu (Lingyu Xu) To: Pine Discussion Forum X-To: pine-info@lists.u.washington.edu X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, Why sometime pine hung on forever .... [ write to FCC ] when send a message ? About one thousand users use our sun-cluster, most users are okay, only one group of user who use another Sun system as their home directory NFS server had that trouble. Basically, they just can't use pine, but sun mail-tool is still working for them. Any suggestion and help are very much appreciated. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:43:00 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA01373 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:42:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA04735; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:42:57 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id QAA22619; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:42:49 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA10138 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:39:58 -0800 Received: from nimbus.anzio.com (ras@nimbus.anzio.com [204.201.253.34]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA30841 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:39:57 -0800 Received: from localhost (ras@localhost) by nimbus.anzio.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA26478 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:19:58 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:19:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Bob Rasmussen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine, Arabic, and Hebrew MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Greetings. We are in the process of enhancing our Windows telnet (terminal emulation) product to support Arabic and Hebrew. If you are interested in corresponding and testing this in conjunction with Pine, please keep reading. Our Product is Anzio. In its current version it can handle a wide variety of character sets (ISO sets, Far East, various codepages). We are now tackling bidirectional languages (Arabic and Hebrew) as well as Arabic's contextual forms (letter reshaping). We have added user control over whether Anzio causes Windows to reorder and reshape the text strings as they go to the screen. This is only possible on Arabic or Hebrew versions of Windows (95/98/NT), or on Windows 2000 (NT 5). If you are interested in working with us on this, please reply privately. Regards, ....Bob Rasmussen, President, Rasmussen Software, Inc. personal e-mail: ras@anzio.com company e-mail: rsi@anzio.com or sales@anzio.com or support@anzio.com ftp://ftp.anzio.com voice: 503-624-0360 http://www.anzio.com fax: 503-624-0760 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:31:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA05329 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:31:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA17067 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:31:29 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id XAA01231; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:28:53 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA46118 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:26:14 -0800 Received: from loki.cscorp.com (loki.cscorp.com [209.76.112.241]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA25964 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:26:14 -0800 Received: from localhost by loki.cscorp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA05605; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:25:56 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:25:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Russell Van Tassell To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: any one explain the difference between different version? In-Reply-To: <36EDC4B0.6112065@usa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: sch X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Check the CHANGES file in the distribution... On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, sch wrote: > Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:40:49 +0800 > From: sch > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: any one explain the difference between different version? > > Anyone here can explain the difference between versions of pine? > 3.96 -> 4.10,or tell me where I can find the information.thanks. > > -- Russell M. Van Tassell russell@cscorp.com From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:38:41 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA14836 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:38:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA25259 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:38:39 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id HAA22488; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:34:35 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA24536 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:31:54 -0800 Received: from jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu (jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu [128.220.2.86]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA24927 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:31:53 -0800 Received: from tech.mse.jhu.edu (tech.mse.jhu.edu [128.220.205.6]) by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.2-29 #26381) with ESMTP id <01J8XMG869LCEFGMR1@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:31:50 EDT Message-Id: Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:31:48 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Don Pliska To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Insufficient permissions when opening address book MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: don@RacerX.mse.jhu.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Maybe someone running (the Windows version) PC Pine 4.10 (on Windows NT workstation) has seen this problem Background information: The Pine "global" address book resides on a NetWare 4.10 server. I have the NetWare directory permissions for this directory to [Read][File Scan] only. My users running PC Pine version 4.05 have no trouble accessing this "global" address book with only [read][file scan] NetWare directory permissions. Problem: I have one user testing the new PC Pine 4.10. This new version works fine except for the "global" address book. He gets the following error message when accessing the "global" address book on NetWare 4.10 server: Insufficient permissions when opening address book In order for this single user running PC Pine 4.10 to successfully use the global address book, I have to give him the additional NetWare directory rights, [erase][create][modify] in addition to the default [read][file scan]. In other words, the default rights [read][file scan] do not let him access this "global" address book. This user testing PC Pine 4.10 does not have this problem running PC Pine 4.05. This same user accesses the same "global" address book with his new version of PC Pine 4.10 as others in my company using PC Pine 4.05. The users running PC Pine 4.05 have no problem accessing the "global" address book and do not have the problem. Has anyone else seen this problem with PC Pine 4.10, or any other version of PC Pine? Thanks, Don Pliska -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 16:59:00 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA24633 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 16:58:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA03799 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 16:58:58 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id QAA13847; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 16:56:33 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA40448 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 16:52:38 -0800 Received: from oa.cmbchina.com ([202.96.161.125]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id QAA30399 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 16:52:28 -0800 Received: from usa.net ([202.96.161.117]) by oa.cmbchina.com (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2 9-3-1997)) with SMTP id 48256E49.005DF0AA; Mon, 2 Mar 1970 01:06:05 +0800 Message-Id: <36F04E73.6F940550@usa.net> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 08:53:08 +0800 Reply-To: shichunhui@usa.net Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: sch To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine4.10 on NT? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: pine-info@u.washington.edu, donald.pliska@jhu.edu X-Accept-Language: zh-CN X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, pliska,can this pine4.10 release be built on NT?there is no makefile.wnt or .nt under the pine and pico directory. If you have built pine4.10 succesefully on windows, please tell me how to do it. If any one here is planning to port pine4.10 to windows,tell me what are you trying to do,and, can I help you? From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:22:18 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA26425 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:22:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA07508 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:22:17 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id RAA06217; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:20:05 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA46584 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:17:10 -0800 Received: from calvin.twntpe.cdc.com (ip129179-17-10.a.cdc.com [129.179.17.10]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA20201 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:17:06 -0800 Received: from edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com by calvin.twntpe.cdc.com; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 09:16:57 +0800 Message-Id: <000501be70dd$03a3eab0$1511b381@edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 09:16:56 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Ed Greshko" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: pine4.10 on NT? In-Reply-To: <36F04E73.6F940550@usa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Cc: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > Hi, pliska,can this pine4.10 release be built on NT?there is no > makefile.wnt or .nt under the pine and pico directory. > > If you have built pine4.10 succesefully on windows, please tell me how > to do it. > > If any one here is planning to port pine4.10 to windows,tell me what are > you trying to do,and, can I help you? You can pick up a compiled copy which runs fine on WinNT from ftp.cac.washington.edu at pine/pcpine/pm410w32.zip. My memory is faded....but I believe there is a licensing issue with regards to the Win port of pcpine which prevents full source from being available. Regards, Ed From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:18:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA24118 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:18:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA05445; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:18:55 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id SAA22250; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:18:47 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA19690 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:15:25 -0800 Received: from oa.cmbchina.com ([202.96.161.125]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id SAA22951 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:15:17 -0800 Received: from usa.net ([202.96.161.117]) by oa.cmbchina.com (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2 9-3-1997)) with SMTP id 48256E49.0065897C; Mon, 2 Mar 1970 02:29:03 +0800 Message-Id: <36F061E7.E6A9273F@usa.net> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 10:16:07 +0800 Reply-To: shichunhui@usa.net Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: sch To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine4.10 on NT? References: <000501be70dd$03a3eab0$1511b381@edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Accept-Language: zh-CN X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I don't like the user interface pine offered, I think I can make it better and offer APIs for other application to dynamically link to the mail utility. If the full source code for windows is forbidden, we still can talk about it, code it , and publish it on other sites even outside USA. Ed Greshko wrote: > > You can pick up a compiled copy which runs fine on WinNT from > ftp.cac.washington.edu > at pine/pcpine/pm410w32.zip. > > My memory is faded....but I believe there is a licensing issue with regards > to the Win port of pcpine which prevents full source from being available. > > Regards, > Ed From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:55:57 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA27498 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:55:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA09210; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:55:54 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id SAA25388; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:55:49 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA39342 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:52:45 -0800 Received: from calvin.twntpe.cdc.com (ip129179-17-10.a.cdc.com [129.179.17.10]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA26866 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:52:40 -0800 Received: from edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com by calvin.twntpe.cdc.com; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 10:52:21 +0800 Message-Id: <000001be70ea$57ba7c10$1511b381@edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 10:52:20 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Ed Greshko" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: pine4.10 on NT? In-Reply-To: <36F061E7.E6A9273F@usa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE712D.65E9F110" X-To: X-Cc: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE712D.65E9F110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I don't like the user interface pine offered, I think I can make > it better and > offer APIs for other application to dynamically link to the mail utility. > > If the full source code for windows is forbidden, we still can > talk about it, > code it , and publish it on other sites even outside USA. I believe the license issue had something to do with the wonderfulness of WinNT which prompted the developers to use commercial code in the Win port. But sure, you can talk about what you are doing. It may even be a good idea to disclose it now in this forum. And you can make all the changes you desire in the Unix version for local use. But read the attached. Then, you could even give the code of the Unix port to the developers and if the consensus is that the overall populace will benefit it may even be integrated in to the release. Regards, Ed ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE712D.65E9F110 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="CPYRIGHT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="CPYRIGHT" CgpQaW5lIGFuZCBQaWNvIGFyZSByZWdpc3RlcmVkIHRyYWRlbWFya3Mgb2YgdGhlIFVuaXZlcnNp dHkgb2YKV2FzaGluZ3Rvbi4gIE5vIGNvbW1lcmNpYWwgdXNlIG9mIHRoZXNlIHRyYWRlbWFya3Mg bWF5IGJlIG1hZGUgd2l0aG91dApwcmlvciB3cml0dGVuIHBlcm1pc3Npb24gb2YgdGhlIFVuaXZl cnNpdHkgb2YgV2FzaGluZ3Rvbi4KClBpbmUsIFBpY28sIGFuZCBQaWxvdCBzb2Z0d2FyZSBhbmQg aXRzIGluY2x1ZGVkIHRleHQgYXJlIENvcHlyaWdodAoxOTg5LTE5OTggYnkgdGhlIFVuaXZlcnNp dHkgb2YgV2FzaGluZ3Rvbi4KClVzZSBvZiBQaW5lL1BpY28vUGlsb3Q6IFlvdSBtYXkgY29tcGls ZSBhbmQgZXhlY3V0ZSB0aGVzZSBwcm9ncmFtcyBmb3IKYW55IHB1cnBvc2UsIGluY2x1ZGluZyBj b21tZXJjaWFsLCB3aXRob3V0IHBheWluZyBhbnl0aGluZyB0byB0aGUKVW5pdmVyc2l0eSBvZiBX YXNoaW5ndG9uLCBwcm92aWRlZCB0aGF0IHRoZSBsZWdhbCBub3RpY2VzIGFyZQptYWludGFpbmVk IGludGFjdCBhbmQgaG9ub3JlZC4KCkxvY2FsIG1vZGlmaWNhdGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIHJlbGVhc2Ug aXMgcGVybWl0dGVkIGFzIGZvbGxvd3MsIG9yIGJ5Cm11dHVhbCBhZ3JlZW1lbnQ6IEluIG9yZGVy IHRvIHJlZHVjZSBjb25mdXNpb24gYW5kIGZhY2lsaXRhdGUKZGVidWdnaW5nLCB3ZSByZXF1ZXN0 IHRoYXQgbG9jYWxseSBtb2RpZmllZCB2ZXJzaW9ucyBiZSBkZW5vdGVkIGJ5CmFwcGVuZGluZyB0 aGUgbGV0dGVyICJMIiB0byB0aGUgY3VycmVudCB2ZXJzaW9uIG51bWJlciwgYW5kIHRoYXQgdGhl CmxvY2FsIGNoYW5nZXMgYmUgZW51bWVyYXRlZCBpbiB0aGUgaW50ZWdyYWwgcmVsZWFzZSBub3Rl cyBhbmQKYXNzb2NpYXRlZCBkb2N1bWVudGF0aW9uLgoKUmVkaXN0cmlidXRpb24gb2YgdGhpcyBy ZWxlYXNlIGlzIHBlcm1pdHRlZCBhcyBmb2xsb3dzLCBvciBieSBtdXR1YWwKYWdyZWVtZW50Ogoo YSkgSW4gZnJlZS1vZi1jaGFyZ2Ugb3IgYXQtY29zdCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb25zIGJ5IG5vbi1wcm9m aXQgY29uY2VybnM7CihiKSBJbiBmcmVlLW9mLWNoYXJnZSBkaXN0cmlidXRpb25zIGJ5IGZvci1w cm9maXQgY29uY2VybnM7CihjKSBJbmNsdXNpb24gaW4gYSBDRC1ST00gY29sbGVjdGlvbiBvZiBm cmVlLW9mLWNoYXJnZSwgc2hhcmV3YXJlLCBvcgogICAgbm9uLXByb3ByaWV0YXJ5IHNvZnR3YXJl IGZvciB3aGljaCBhIGZlZSBtYXkgYmUgY2hhcmdlZCBmb3IgdGhlCiAgICBwYWNrYWdlZCBkaXN0 cmlidXRpb24uCgpSZWRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBvZiBiaW5hcnkgdmVyc2lvbnMgaXMgZnVydGhlciBj b25zdHJhaW5lZCBieSBsaWNlbnNlCmFncmVlbWVudHMgZm9yIGluY29ycG9yYXRlZCBsaWJyYXJp ZXMgZnJvbSB0aGlyZCBwYXJ0aWVzLCBlLmcuIExEQVAsCkdTU0FQSS4KClRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5 IG9mIFdhc2hpbmd0b24gZW5jb3VyYWdlcyB1bnJlc3RyaWN0ZWQgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIG9mCmlu ZGl2aWR1YWwgcGF0Y2hlcyB0byB0aGUgUGluZSBzeXN0ZW0uIEJ5ICJwYXRjaGVzIiB3ZSBtZWFu CiJkaWZmZXJlbmNlIiBmaWxlcyB0aGF0IGNhbiBiZSBhcHBsaWVkIHRvIHRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5 IG9mIFdhc2hpbmd0b24KUGluZSBzb3VyY2UgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIGluIG9yZGVyIHRvIGFjY29t cGxpc2ggYnVnIGZpeGVzLCBtaW5vcgplbmhhbmNlbWVudHMsIG9yIGFkYXB0YXRpb24gdG8gbmV3 IG9wZXJhdGluZyBzeXN0ZW1zLiBTdWJtaXNzaW9uIG9mCnRoZXNlIHBhdGNoZXMgdG8gVW5pdmVy c2l0eSBvZiBXYXNoaW5ndG9uIGZvciBwb3NzaWJsZSBpbmNsdXNpb24gaW4KZnV0dXJlIFBpbmUg dmVyc2lvbnMgaXMgYWxzbyBlbmNvdXJhZ2VkLgoKVGhlIGFib3ZlIHBlcm1pc3Npb25zIGFyZSBo ZXJlYnkgZ3JhbnRlZCwgcHJvdmlkZWQgdGhhdCB0aGUgUGluZSBhbmQKUGljbyBjb3B5cmlnaHQg YW5kIHRyYWRlbWFyayBub3RpY2VzIGFwcGVhciBpbiBhbGwgY29waWVzIGFuZCB0aGF0CmJvdGgg dGhlIGFib3ZlIGNvcHlyaWdodCBub3RpY2UgYW5kIHRoaXMgcGVybWlzc2lvbiBub3RpY2UgYXBw ZWFyIGluCnN1cHBvcnRpbmcgZG9jdW1lbnRhdGlvbiwgYW5kIHRoYXQgdGhlIG5hbWUgb2YgdGhl IFVuaXZlcnNpdHkgb2YKV2FzaGluZ3RvbiBub3QgYmUgdXNlZCBpbiBhZHZlcnRpc2luZyBvciBw dWJsaWNpdHkgcGVydGFpbmluZyB0bwpkaXN0cmlidXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIHNvZnR3YXJlIHdpdGhv dXQgc3BlY2lmaWMsIHByaW9yIHdyaXR0ZW4KcGVybWlzc2lvbi4gVGhpcyBzb2Z0d2FyZSBpcyBt YWRlIGF2YWlsYWJsZSAiYXMgaXMiLCBhbmQKClRIRSBVTklWRVJTSVRZIE9GIFdBU0hJTkdUT04g RElTQ0xBSU1TIEFMTCBXQVJSQU5USUVTLCBFWFBSRVNTIE9SCklNUExJRUQsIFdJVEggUkVHQVJE IFRPIFRISVMgU09GVFdBUkUsIElOQ0xVRElORyBXSVRIT1VUIExJTUlUQVRJT04KQUxMIElNUExJ RUQgV0FSUkFOVElFUyBPRiBNRVJDSEFOVEFCSUxJVFkgQU5EIEZJVE5FU1MgRk9SIEEgUEFSVElD VUxBUgpQVVJQT1NFLCBBTkQgSU4gTk8gRVZFTlQgU0hBTEwgVEhFIFVOSVZFUlNJVFkgT0YgV0FT SElOR1RPTiBCRSBMSUFCTEUKRk9SIEFOWSBTUEVDSUFMLCBJTkRJUkVDVCBPUiBDT05TRVFVRU5U SUFMIERBTUFHRVMgT1IgQU5ZIERBTUFHRVMKV0hBVFNPRVZFUiBSRVNVTFRJTkcgRlJPTSBMT1NT IE9GIFVTRSwgREFUQSBPUiBQUk9GSVRTLCBXSEVUSEVSIElOIEFOCkFDVElPTiBPRiBDT05UUkFD VCwgVE9SVCAoSU5DTFVESU5HIE5FR0xJR0VOQ0UpIE9SIFNUUklDVCBMSUFCSUxJVFksCkFSSVNJ TkcgT1VUIE9GIE9SIElOIENPTk5FQ1RJT04gV0lUSCBUSEUgVVNFIE9SIFBFUkZPUk1BTkNFIE9G IFRISVMKU09GVFdBUkUuCg== ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE712D.65E9F110-- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 22:45:41 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA16677 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 22:45:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA09677; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 22:45:39 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id WAA00991; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 22:45:34 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id WAA10852 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 22:40:49 -0800 Received: from hotmail.com (law-f149.hotmail.com [209.185.131.212]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id WAA32121 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 22:40:49 -0800 Received: (qmail 5646 invoked by uid 65534); 18 Mar 1999 06:40:46 -0000 Received: from 203.197.152.22 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 22:40:41 PST Message-Id: <19990318064046.5645.qmail@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 22:40:41 PST Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Selvi Jagannathan" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: "From" in PC-PINE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [203.197.152.22] X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi ! I am trying to setup a combination of PINE and PC-PINE for our email network. The facility is as follows. We have an email server(Linux), two HP-UX servers and 15 win 95 machines on the network. The HP-UX servers has ten dump terminals connected to them. Now I am planning to configure pine every where(Linux, HP-UX and WIN95) with email server working as IMAP server. In the Linux and HP-UX combination works fine. every where(Linux, HP-UX and WIN95) with email server working as IMAP server. In the Linux and HP-UX combination works fine. Whether the user uses the HP-UX machine or sitting in Linux machine sees the same set mail folders and address books. And the signature file ios duplicated on both servers. And they have same login id in both the machines. So the From address is taken care of with domain name is set as it to look it isgenerated from the Email server. Now the WIN95 & Linux doesn'twork in the same way. The folders and address books look samein both. But the problem is with Signature file and From headerI solved the signature problem by having a dummy signature mailin one of the folders, use forward option instead of the composeoption to send a newmail.But what to do with From header option I don't know. It asks theuser to key in the login and personal name for wach session sinceI can't save this details in pinerc. Since for opening the inboxI can't save this details in pinerc. Since for opening the inboxthe user keys in the login and password of the IMAP server. Is itpossible to take the info needed for the from header from theIMAP server using the login id. Say may using a finger or somedirectory service.Any ideas please. Thanks in Advance. Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:07:04 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA07754 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:07:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA22916; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:07:01 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id LAA15640; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:06:51 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA39348 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:02:18 -0800 Received: from offsv1.CIS.McMaster.CA (kleefstr@offsv1.CIS.McMaster.CA [130.113.226.8]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA29436 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:02:17 -0800 Received: from localhost (kleefstr@localhost) by offsv1.CIS.McMaster.CA (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA04761 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 14:02:04 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 14:02:04 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Jessie Kleefstra To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: next release In-Reply-To: <000801be6f65$58131c20$1511b381@edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I would like to ask the Pine Team if you know approximately when the next release of Pine will be? Right now we're running Pine 4.10 (it's good) on one of our office servers but we had to rebuild it with a beta imap to fix the lock folders problem. I really don't want to let 16,000 staff students and faculty run with beta stuff. Another question: We are investigating filtering software (in particular,to filter out SPAM). I have been looking at procmail and software that runs with it. Would you have any suggestions on what might be one of the easiest and safest filtering programs that will run with Pine? I don't want students or faculty to start playing around and end up loosing all of their mail. We are running Sun machines with Solaris 2.6. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jessie Kleefstra E-Mail: kleefstr@offsv1.cis.mcmaster.ca Sr.Consultant, Helpdesk Services helpline@mcmaster.ca Computing & Information Services Phone: (905) 525-9140 ext. 24357 ABB-132 Fax: (905) 528-3773 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:37:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA08738 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:37:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA26626; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:37:31 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id LAA24007; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:37:18 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA08924 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:32:51 -0800 Received: from kootcom.kootenay.net (kootcom.kootenay.net [209.52.230.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA20667 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:32:51 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by kootcom.kootenay.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA15532; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 19:36:45 GMT Received: from ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca by kootcom.kootenay.net; Thu, 18 Mar 99 11:36 PST Received: from localhost (jrasku@localhost) by ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA20334; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:29:49 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:29:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Jessica Rasku To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: next release In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Jessie Kleefstra X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Jessie Kleefstra wrote: > Another question: We are investigating filtering software (in > particular,to filter out SPAM). I have been looking at procmail and > software that runs with it. Would you have any suggestions on what might > be one of the easiest and safest filtering programs that will run with > Pine? I don't want students or faculty to start playing around and end up > loosing all of their mail. You do not want to use procmail if you think it would cause problems to have students or faculty deleting all their mail. Of course, there are front ends to the .procmailrc files that should prevent this sort of thing (or at least make it more difficult to happen). One thing that you could do with procmail is to setup a global procmailrc that creates a ``backup'' of the incoming mail. I don't know how easy it would be to setup. My personal feeling is that if you provide the tools, and explain the risks, then people who make a mess are responsible for the problems they have created. Just try to make sure that the problems that they can create are as limited in scope as possible. ANY filtering software will probably allow you to delete all your mail... Jessica -- Jessica Rasku, Box 270, Rossland, B.C., V0G 1Y0, (250) 362-5701, LinuxBox: (250) 362-9668. List manager: majordomo@ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca send command help ---- To get help with majordomo or lists ---- To get a list of all lists on server. WWW: From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:26:04 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id EAA23912 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:26:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id EAA08845; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:26:00 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id EAA08513; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:25:53 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id EAA19582 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:21:38 -0800 Received: from hotmail.com (law-f249.hotmail.com [209.185.130.214]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id EAA01755 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:21:38 -0800 Received: (qmail 22512 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 1999 12:14:50 -0000 Received: from 203.197.152.43 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:14:50 PST Message-Id: <19990319121450.22511.qmail@hotmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:14:50 PST Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Selvi Jagannathan" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Signature in PC-PINE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [203.197.152.43] X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there any way I can allow my multiple users using a single PC-PINE to have their signatures from their IMAP servers to be added to thier email messages. Or is it possible to install PC-PINE on SAMBA server and allow my users have diff. instances of PC-PINE with diff PINERC TIA for any ideas Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:59:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA04050 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA29969; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:59:04 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id SAA01921; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:58:53 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA45174 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:55:55 -0800 Received: from loki.cscorp.com (loki.cscorp.com [209.76.112.241]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA09491 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:55:54 -0800 Received: from localhost by loki.cscorp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA00423; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:55:05 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:55:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Russell Van Tassell To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: next release In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Jessie Kleefstra X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Jessie Kleefstra wrote: > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 14:02:04 -0500 (EST) > From: Jessie Kleefstra > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: next release > > [...] > > Another question: We are investigating filtering software (in > particular,to filter out SPAM). I have been looking at procmail and > software that runs with it. Would you have any suggestions on what might > be one of the easiest and safest filtering programs that will run with > Pine? I don't want students or faculty to start playing around and end up > loosing all of their mail. One of the problems with personal mail filters is that one wrong step means your filters become rather nazi... procmail is extremely powerful and configureable but can easily remove you from having any email to read. You might just slap procmail in someplace where it can't be reached by mere mortals (read: users) and then just use a global procmailrc file (but that then puts you in the "hot seat" as "chief censor" and once you do that you find yourself in a rather precarious legal position). You might just "install the tools" and let people "use it at their own risk." (Or, if you, again, want to install a pretty good filter on-top of procmail, check out "The Spam Bouncer" by Catherine A. Hampton at http://www-new.hrweb.org/spambouncer/ -- you can install that globally and allow users "a pretty good pre-configured filter" that they can prety much configure to their needs) You might also just want to head over to the procmail mailing list and see if anyone has some good help over there for you. You can get on it through normal mailing list efforts: Procmail-request@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE Hope that helps... Russell -- Russell M. Van Tassell russell@cscorp.com From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:21:10 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA19986 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:21:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA28936; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:21:07 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id NAA03885; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:19:44 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA35936 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:16:04 -0800 Received: from dopey.int.wisc.edu (xena.biostat.wisc.edu [144.92.73.146]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA15758 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:16:02 -0800 Received: from localhost (pfschill@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dopey.int.wisc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id PAA25444 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:15:57 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:15:55 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Paul Schilling To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: display-filter bug w/ 4.10 and tcsh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: pfschill@dopey.int.wisc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have been having a problem getting a PGP display-filter to work with pine 4.10. The problem occurs with 4.10 when a SHELL of tcsh or csh is used. When you select a PGP signed email message it tries to start the filter but gives a 'tcsh: permission denied' error message (I had to use script to figure this out as it changes screens to fast to read). If I set the SHELL env variable to either /bin/sh or /usr/bin/zsh it will work. But if the SHELL is set to /usr/bin/tcsh or /bin/csh it fails. Also it is not just a display filter error. Trying the pipe gives the same error. Any ideas? -- Paul Schilling pfschill@bigfoot.com Home: 608-288-0194 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 14:53:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA31726 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 14:53:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA30160; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 14:53:44 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id OAA23377; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 14:52:27 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA45730 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 14:49:17 -0800 Received: from mail.iex.net (mail.iex.net [192.156.196.5]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA04551 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 14:49:17 -0800 Received: from janeway.plaidranch.org (IDENT:root@plaidranch.org [209.151.69.19]) by mail.iex.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA07242 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:43:33 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (IDENT:manuka@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by janeway.plaidranch.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA10902 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:48:53 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:48:53 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Ian Hall-Beyer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: 4.10 not dying cleanly? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: manuka@janeway.plaidranch.org X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have noticed this problem starting with v4.10, where if the login session that is running it times out or is disconnected, Pine is still running. when the user logs back in, pine no longer attempts to grab the mailbock lock from the previous process... can someone enlighten me? -Ian -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:28:44 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA12542 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:28:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA14157; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:28:41 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id LAA23462; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:28:31 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA40004 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:24:32 -0800 Received: from dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.14]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id LAA15331 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:24:31 -0800 Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA19290 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:24:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from unknown(38.160.91.7) by dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma019142; Mon Mar 22 13:23:26 1999 Message-Id: <000401be7499$4d2d8640$cb0100c0@61> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:22:18 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Bill Goulette" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Y2K compliance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I am running version 3.90 pine for UNIX. Can anyone direct me to the most recent (closest to Y2K compliant) version available? Thanks Bill Goulette -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:46:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA16873 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:46:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA18766; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:46:00 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id MAA27393; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:45:55 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA40126 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:42:12 -0800 Received: from usc.edu (usc.edu [128.125.253.136]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA02461 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:42:12 -0800 Received: from Law.USC.EDU (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by usc.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8/usc) with SMTP id MAA06487; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:42:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from faculty.Law.USC.EDU by Law.USC.EDU (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04454; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:36:46 PST Received: from l2122.usc.edu by faculty.Law.USC.EDU (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA07532; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:54:25 PST Message-Id: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:40:34 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: strange occurence in PC-Pine 4.05 and 4.10. In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Terry Gray X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN FYI, PC-Pine's URL's work now that we installed IE4 on those systems that didn't have it. Thanks for the tip. RCL On Sat, 20 Feb 1999, Terry Gray wrote: > Robert, > PC-Pine by default uses the windows registry to figure out what browser to > use, and for that matter, how to handle MIME attachments. > > This seems to work fine with systems on which Internet Explorer 4.x has > been installed, but I think I've seen some other non-IE4 systems that had > troubles similar to yours. In other words, I think IE4 may install some > registry stuff that is necessary for Pine's registry sniffing to work > right. > > I suspect that if you enter the URL in the Windows "Start/Run" dialog box, > it will fail with the same kinds of errors. (Normally on the Windows > systems I use, you can just enter "http://whatever" in the "Run" dialog > box, and that will automatically fire up the default browser.) > > You can also experiment with the explicit browser path variable in the > pinerc... > > -teg > > On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am an avid fan of PC-Pine, but there is one thing that is > > bothering me. (Yes, I checked the newsgroup and the FAQ, but was > > unsuccessful finding anything related) > > > > I installed PC-Pine 4.05 from scratch on a user's system, who was > > telnetting to Pine before. When he tries to select a valid URL, he gets > > the message... > > > > "Cannot find the file 'http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~ckallas' (or one of > > its components). Make sure the path and filename are correct and that all > > required libraries are available." > > > > Now, he has tried this on multiple URL's, all which work on mine > > and others using PC-Pine. (I just upgraded to 4.10 from 4.05, and I > > noticed no similar problem in either version). > > > > He is running Win95A w/Communicator 4.5 (I upgraded him from Netscape 4.08 > > thinking this might be the cause). These items are selected... > > > > [X] enable-msg-view-attachments > > [X] enable-msg-view-urls > > [X] enable-msg-view-web-hostnames > > > > Here is the Journal entry that Pine reports when the 1st user tries to > > access a URL... > > > > "Cannot spawn command : *Shell*" > > > > My PC-Pine 4.10 says... > > > > "VIEWER command completed" > > > > To further confuse things, another user is also experiencing this problem, > > and we just upgraded him to 4.10 from 3.95. His configuration is > > identical except that he is using Netscape 4.07. > > > > Any thoughts? Is there a hidden config variable I missed somewhere or > > that was automatically set that would cause this? I looked through the > > Pinerc file, and couldn't find any option related to this. I also looked > > through the technical docs, with no luck. > > > > HELP! > > > > Thanks, > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > ` Robert Larmon ` > > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:46:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA18235 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:46:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA21857; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:46:13 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id OAA22717; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:46:06 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA43524 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:43:20 -0800 Received: from kootcom.kootenay.net (kootcom.kootenay.net [209.52.230.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA16246 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:43:20 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by kootcom.kootenay.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA26983; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 19:47:06 GMT Received: from ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca by kootcom.kootenay.net; Mon, 22 Mar 99 11:47 PST Received: from localhost (jrasku@localhost) by ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA21198; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:31:53 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:31:46 -0800 (PST) Sender: owner-pine-info@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Jessica Rasku To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Y2K compliance In-Reply-To: <000401be7499$4d2d8640$cb0100c0@61> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bill Goulette X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Bill Goulette wrote: > I am running version 3.90 pine for UNIX. Can anyone direct me to the most > recent (closest to Y2K compliant) version available? > Thanks To my knowledge there are no Y2K concerns with any version of Pine. The only use of dates as far as I know is in the Date: field of the message header, and no date that I know of will crash Pine. The problem that may show up (and probably can't be handled at all), is dealing with messages with non compliant (hm, RFC 822 specifies a 2 digit date, has this been updated at some point?) mail readers. But, the problem is that those messages may be placed in the wrong place in the date sorted list... Am I sorely mistaken? Jessica -- Jessica Rasku, Box 270, Rossland, B.C., V0G 1Y0, (250) 362-5701, LinuxBox: (250) 362-9668. List manager: majordomo@ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca send command help ---- To get help with majordomo or lists ---- To get a list of all lists on server. WWW: From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:17:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA26009 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:17:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA02004; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:17:07 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id AAA29815; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:16:53 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA43684 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:12:29 -0800 Received: from chailly.ensmp.fr (root@chailly.ensmp.fr [192.54.172.200]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA14533 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:12:27 -0800 Received: from coulommiers.ensmp.fr (coelho@coulommiers.ensmp.fr [192.54.172.245]) by chailly.ensmp.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8/chailly-CRI) with ESMTP id JAA24393 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:12:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (coelho@localhost) by coulommiers.ensmp.fr (8.8.7/8.8.5/client-linux_RK_CRI) with ESMTP id JAA26405 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:11:32 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:11:26 +0100 (CET) Sender: owner-pine-info@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Fabien COELHO To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: bug report MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: coulommiers.ensmp.fr: coelho owned process doing -bs X-Sender: coelho@coulommiers.ensmp.fr X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I want to report small bugs/inconsistencies in PINE 4.10. As I spent 20 minutes to find any bug-report address and could not find any, so I finally ends on this list without being sure that it is appropriate, here is bug one: bug #1: there is no clear way to report a simple "bug", or at least I could not find it from the documentation. bug #2: when adding new viewers or filters in the Setup/Config section, these programs must be given with their full path 'for security reasons'. fine with me. However, if the user forget to do so, the line is just ignored SILENTLY. I think that it should not be so quiet, i.e. the configuration should at least warn the user if the entry is to be ignored. bug #3: as for html viewers, I found no way to chose an alternate viewer from the predefined list. One can just edit the viewer. I think that it would be more consistent in pine to offer to switch between its configured viewers, as it is done with mail filters or even roles. -- Fabien. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:24:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA10497 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:24:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA13392; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:24:13 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA00399; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:23:54 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA33370 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:21:01 -0800 Received: from comp.nl ([194.151.63.59]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA06716 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:21:00 -0800 Received: from hans [194.151.63.62] by comp.nl (SMTPD32-4.06) id ACA0161000B0; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 18:17:20 EST Message-Id: <008401be7552$38458200$3e3f97c2@comp.nl> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 18:26:00 +0100 Sender: owner-pine-info@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Hans Hofman" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Porting pine to dos/windows MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I'm having problems porting the source code of pine to windows/dos. Is there a project file and files which are adjusted for Microsoft Visual C/C++ v6.0 or Borland C/C++ v5.02 Any help is greatly appreciated. -- Hans -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:57:22 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA03246 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:57:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA20479; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:57:20 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id MAA12153; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:56:50 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA48504 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:53:18 -0800 Received: from loki.cscorp.com (loki.cscorp.com [209.76.112.241]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id MAA05881 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:53:17 -0800 Received: from localhost by loki.cscorp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA23576; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:52:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:52:25 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Russell Van Tassell To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: bug report In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Fabien COELHO X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Fabien COELHO wrote: > Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:11:26 +0100 (CET) > From: Fabien COELHO > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: bug report > > > Hello, > > I want to report small bugs/inconsistencies in PINE 4.10. As I spent > 20 minutes to find any bug-report address and could not find any, so I > finally ends on this list without being sure that it is appropriate, here > is bug one: > > bug #1: there is no clear way to report a simple "bug", or at least I > could not find it from the documentation. It's actually pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu (which is changeable in the global configuration file. They also make mention of a "Report Bug" command. However, I've yet to find that "command" (though I've not looked terribly hard). -- Russell M. Van Tassell russell@cscorp.com From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:56:09 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA03254 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA32680; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:56:03 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id VAA13610; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:55:49 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA26814 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:52:44 -0800 Received: from kootcom.kootenay.net (kootcom.kootenay.net [209.52.230.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA16713 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:52:43 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by kootcom.kootenay.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA01108; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 05:56:52 GMT Received: from ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca by kootcom.kootenay.net; Tue, 23 Mar 99 21:56 PST Received: from localhost (jrasku@localhost) by ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA32029; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:46:30 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:46:29 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Jessica Rasku To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: bug report In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Russell Van Tassell X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Russell Van Tassell wrote: > It's actually pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu (which is changeable in the > global configuration file. They also make mention of a "Report Bug" > command. However, I've yet to find that "command" (though I've not > looked terribly hard). I have not found it in 4.05, but in 3.96, I didn't have a problem. The address pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu as far as I can see is not in the online documentation for 4.05. Maybe I'm missing something... Jessica -- Jessica Rasku, Box 270, Rossland, B.C., V0G 1Y0, (250) 362-5701, LinuxBox: (250) 362-9668. List manager: majordomo@ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca send command help ---- To get help with majordomo or lists ---- To get a list of all lists on server. WWW: From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 07:32:44 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA15950 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 07:32:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA09387; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 07:32:41 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id HAA13792; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 07:32:19 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA32302 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 07:28:42 -0800 Received: from kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (SYSTEM@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu [129.237.32.2]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA15567 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 07:28:41 -0800 Received: from KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU by KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU (PMDF V5.2-31 #32698) id <01J97C4R2N0000MH3U@KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:28:39 CST (UTC -06:00) Message-Id: <01J97CABUBPK00MH3U@KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:27:51 -0600 (UTC -06:00) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: sloane@UKANS.EDU To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Problems with Fcc: inbox MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII X-Sender: Bob Sloane X-Cc: SLOANE@KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi All, As explained in the FAQ (7.8.2), we have mail moved to users home directory by using procmail as our local mail deliver agent configured to deliver to ~/.mail. We modified the inbox-path in pine.conf to point to ~/.mail and normal reading of mail seems to work just fine. The problem comes in when a user uses "inbox" as an Fcc: address. For example, if .addressbook contains: bob bob sloane sloane@ukans.edu inbox pine 3.95q puts the copy in /var/spool/mail/$USER. Using pine 4.10, the first time you use the Fcc: inbox pine asks if you want to create the folder, and if you say yes, creates a folder called "inbox". The second time you use Fcc: it asks again if you want to create the folder, and then complains that it can't create it. All seems to work as expected if the default mail spool file has not been moved. How do I configure pine to look in the correct location for Fcc: inbox when the default inbox is ~/.mail? -- USmail: Bob Sloane, University of Kansas Computer Center, Lawrence, KS, 66045 E-mail: sloane@ukans.edu http://www.ukans.edu/home/sloane Phone:(785)864-0444 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:19:09 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA15339 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:19:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA08776; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:19:06 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA00670; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:18:13 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA15544 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:13:10 -0800 Received: from ftpbox.mot.com (ftpbox.mot.com [129.188.136.101]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA10927 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:13:09 -0800 Received: [from pobox2.mot.com (pobox2.mot.com [129.188.137.195]) by ftpbox.mot.com (MOT-ftpbox 1.0) with ESMTP id LAA21668 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:13:08 -0600 (CST)] Received: [from relay2.cig.mot.com (relay2.cig.mot.com [136.182.15.24]) by pobox2.mot.com (MOT-pobox2 2.0) with ESMTP id LAA09386 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:11:38 -0600 (CST)] Received: from calico.cig.mot.com (burca@calico [136.182.8.104]) by relay2.cig.mot.com (8.9.0/SCERG-RELAY-1.11b) with ESMTP id LAA26898 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:07:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (burca@localhost) by calico.cig.mot.com (8.8.5/SCERG-1.12B) with SMTP id LAA18645 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:07:19 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:07:19 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Gabriel Burca To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Alternate editor options MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: burca@calico X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I want to pass a space containing command line option to my alternate editor when it is invoked from pine but pine insists on interpreting the option as one of the filenames to edit. I end up with two files in my editor: the file listed under "working file" below and the temporary file that pine normaly passes to the editor. editor set to this working file ================== ============ 1. vim ~/pico.007505 2. vim -c "set textwidth=75" ~/textwidth=75" 3. vim -c set\ textwidth=75 ~/textwidth=75 4. vim -c "set textwidth=75" _TMPFILE_ ~/textwidth=75" & _TMPFILE_ Cases 1-3 work just fine if I use them on the command line, so the problem is in how pine interprets and passes the arguments to the editor. How can I tell pine that "set textwidth=75" is ONE argument, not two? TIA -- --+---++++-- Gabriel B. Burca (burca at cig dt mot dt com) --++---++-+---- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:26:08 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA30405 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:26:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA25677; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:26:05 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id AAA23541; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:25:52 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA49870 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:22:40 -0800 Received: from cuimail.unige.ch (cuimail.unige.ch [129.194.69.50]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id AAA15897 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:22:39 -0800 Received: from cuisun10 (cuisun10.unige.ch [129.194.69.60]) by cuimail.unige.ch (PMDF V5.2-31 #32426) with SMTP id <0F97008U70LQIJ@cuimail.unige.ch> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:22:38 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <36FB43CD.324F@cui.unige.ch> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:22:37 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: MAYENCOURT Nicolas To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine4.10 + Solaris MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Sender: Nicolas.Mayencourt@cui.unige.ch X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I have try to use Pine4.10 with Solaris 2.6, and I am not able to use CRAM-MD5 autentification. I have try to compile Pine with gcc, with Sun cc et to get a precompiled version, the problem is allways the same, my imap server does not accept my password!. The server is PMDF 5.2 on Solaris 2.6 I'm pretty sure the problem is on the pine side because: I have try a SunOS version, from SunOS and from Solaris, and a Linux version: there all work well This bug does not seems to be known. Does any body have already try pine4.10 + CRAM-MD5 + Solaris 2.6? Any advice is wellcome, thanks! -- Nicolas Mayencourt EMAIL: Nicolas.Mayencourt@cui.unige.ch Centre Universitaire d'Informatique VOICE: +41 (22) 705 76 50 Universite de GENEVE FAX: +41 (22) 705 77 80 24 rue General-Dufour WWW: http://cuiwww.unige.ch CH-1211 GENEVE 4 mailto:Nicolas.Mayencourt@cui.unige.ch -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:18:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA15573 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:18:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA15536; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:18:11 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id UAA22746; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:17:49 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA43108 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:13:00 -0800 Received: from godai.maison-otaku.net (loki@godai.maison-otaku.net [216.122.4.156]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA02406 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:13:00 -0800 Received: from localhost (loki@localhost) by godai.maison-otaku.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA21140 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:12:58 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:12:57 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Jeremy Blackman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE/IMAP/RFC2369 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: godai.maison-otaku.net: loki owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Heya... this may not be the best place to ask, but I didn't see a 'pine-dev' list, so... I've been doing a bit of PINE hacking over the past couple days, adding support for RFC2369 to my local copy. (RFC2369 specifies special RFC822 headers that mailing list software can add to the headers of posts in order to provide commands for subscribing/unsubscribing, getting help, contacting the list owner, etc.) As more mailing list packages begin to support RFC2369, and as several clients (Pegasus, Eudora, etc.) are supporting it now, and I'd just finished adding support for RFC2369 to the mailing list package I write, I thought I'd hack support for it into my copy of PINE (hey, why not?). Well, everything goes great up to a point. When reading from a local mail spool, PINE finds the headers correctly, activates the 'Mailing List' option, and you can go to the 'Mailing List' screen to unsubscribe, surf to the mailing list archives, contact the list owner, etc. Works perfectly, no problems. Not bad, for the first time I ever touched PINE's source code. However, it works somewhat less well (e.g. not at all) over IMAP. As my primary method of reading my mail is over IMAP, this is a bit of a bummer for me. I would have thought I only needed to add the RFC2369 headers to the 'extraheaders' list, but it appears that doesn't do the trick. It just never populates the envelope variables for the listserver options... Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks!! --Jeremy -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 02:12:15 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id CAA14592 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 02:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id CAA25439; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 02:12:12 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id CAA19319; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 02:11:42 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id CAA27422 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 02:07:14 -0800 Received: from comp.nl ([194.151.63.59]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id CAA12189 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 02:07:13 -0800 Received: from hans [194.151.63.62] by comp.nl (SMTPD32-4.06) id ACC06FC00B0; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:02:40 EST Message-Id: <002601be783a$4235a200$3e3f97c2@comp.nl> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:12:02 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Hans Hofman" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I'm having problems porting the source code of pine to windows/dos. Is there a project file and files which are adjusted for Microsoft Visual C/C++ v6.0 or Borland C/C++ v5.02 Ther is no projoct / makefile for this platform although Pine devellopers are speaking about it. I would like to make an automatic email extractor including attachments. Any help is greatly appreciated. Hans From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:23:18 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA25559 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:23:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA24816; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:23:16 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA10626; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:22:16 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA32496 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:17:53 -0800 Received: from olive.cac.washington.edu (olive.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.99]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA06557 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:17:53 -0800 Received: from ldsl135.sttl.uswest.net by olive.cac.washington.edu (NeXT-1.0 (From Sendmail 5.52)/UW-NDC Revision: 2.21 ) id AA27201; Sat, 27 Mar 99 08:17:48 PST Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:18:18 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Terry Gray To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? In-Reply-To: <002601be783a$4235a200$3e3f97c2@comp.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Hans Hofman X-Cc: pine-info@u.washington.edu X-X-Sender: gray@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hans, We already provide a windows version of pine, but we can't release source for it because it includes proprietary code that we licensed for the windows version. However, for your project it may be sufficient to have access to the c-client libraries, for which complete source is freely available. These are used for both pc and Unix versions of Pine and provide all the low-level MIME parsing and message access/storage routines. -teg On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Hans Hofman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having problems porting the source code of pine to windows/dos. > Is there a project file and files which are adjusted for Microsoft Visual > C/C++ v6.0 or Borland C/C++ v5.02 > Ther is no projoct / makefile for this platform although Pine devellopers > are speaking about it. > I would like to make an automatic email extractor including attachments. > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > > Hans From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:47:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA26094 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA25904; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:47:43 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA05763; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:46:44 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA44416 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:42:07 -0800 Received: from sos.sos.net (root@sos.net [209.20.224.2]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA04693 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:42:07 -0800 Received: from ACER (sos-dialup154.nwlink.com [209.20.225.154]) by sos.sos.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA11941; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:42:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:42:25 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Terry Gray X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: leibrand@leibrand.deskmail.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Are there any plans to release a dos/win3.1 version of Pine 4? It's a major inconvenience for users to be unable to access their shared address book on older machines... Thanx. -- Scott Leibrand C&C Student Staff sleib@cac.washington.edu leibrand@u.washington.edu How to contact me: http://students.washington.edu/leibrand/howtocontactme.html * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On 27 Mar 1999, Terry Gray wrote: > Hans, > We already provide a windows version of pine, but we can't release source > for it because it includes proprietary code that we licensed for the > windows version. > > However, for your project it may be sufficient to have access to the > c-client libraries, for which complete source is freely available. These > are used for both pc and Unix versions of Pine and provide all the > low-level MIME parsing and message access/storage routines. > > -teg > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Hans Hofman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm having problems porting the source code of pine to windows/dos. > > Is there a project file and files which are adjusted for Microsoft Visual > > C/C++ v6.0 or Borland C/C++ v5.02 > > Ther is no projoct / makefile for this platform although Pine devellopers > > are speaking about it. > > I would like to make an automatic email extractor including attachments. > > > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > > > > Hans > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:52:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA15258 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA31430; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:52:55 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA12329; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:51:56 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA26860 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:45:43 -0800 Received: from olive.cac.washington.edu (olive.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.99]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA28907; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:45:43 -0800 Received: from ldsl135.sttl.uswest.net by olive.cac.washington.edu (NeXT-1.0 (From Sendmail 5.52)/UW-NDC Revision: 2.21 ) id AA27228; Sat, 27 Mar 99 09:45:42 PST Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:46:12 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Terry Gray To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Scott Leibrand X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gray@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Alas, DOS/Win3 users are relegated to the Pine 3.9x family... and can therefore share addressbooks only via remote filesystems, not IMAP. (Of course old machines also run telnet just fine :) Sorry... it's a "price of progress" -teg On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > Are there any plans to release a dos/win3.1 version of Pine 4? It's a > major inconvenience for users to be unable to access their shared address > book on older machines... > > Thanx. > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:39:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA27751 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:39:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA31070; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:39:18 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id QAA22214; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:37:58 -0800 Received: from jason03.u.washington.edu (root@jason03.u.washington.edu [140.142.77.10]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA16882 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:34:04 -0800 Received: from vergil01.u.washington.edu (leibrand@vergil01.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.6]) by jason03.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA15716; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:34:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by vergil01.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA38302; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:34:02 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:34:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Terry Gray X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Ok, but why? What is the technical limitation that prevents dos/3.1 machines from running Pine 4? Thanx. Scott Leibrand leibrand@u.washington.edu * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Terry Gray wrote: > Alas, > DOS/Win3 users are relegated to the Pine 3.9x family... and can therefore > share addressbooks only via remote filesystems, not IMAP. > > (Of course old machines also run telnet just fine :) > > Sorry... it's a "price of progress" > > -teg > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > Are there any plans to release a dos/win3.1 version of Pine 4? It's a > > major inconvenience for users to be unable to access their shared address > > book on older machines... > > > > Thanx. > > > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:01:41 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA29874 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:01:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA32278; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:01:38 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id SAA18136; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:00:23 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA26758 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 17:56:28 -0800 Received: from mole.slip.net (mole.slip.net [207.171.193.16]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA03070 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 17:56:28 -0800 Received: from slip-3.slip.net ([207.171.193.17] ident=batchman) by mole.slip.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1) id 10R4oK-0002kg-00 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 17:56:24 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 17:56:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Shoeless in San Jose To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN It's a 32-bit program. At best, you'd have to have Win32 running, and I personally have never been able to get it to work the way it's supposed to. Greg On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > Ok, but why? What is the technical limitation that prevents dos/3.1 > machines from running Pine 4? > > Thanx. > Scott Leibrand > leibrand@u.washington.edu > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Terry Gray wrote: > > > Alas, > > DOS/Win3 users are relegated to the Pine 3.9x family... and can therefore > > share addressbooks only via remote filesystems, not IMAP. > > > > (Of course old machines also run telnet just fine :) > > > > Sorry... it's a "price of progress" > > > > -teg > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > > > Are there any plans to release a dos/win3.1 version of Pine 4? It's a > > > major inconvenience for users to be unable to access their shared address > > > book on older machines... > > > > > > Thanx. > > > > > > > > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:14:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA21386 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:14:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA05266; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:14:27 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id SAA07655; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:13:16 -0800 Received: from jason02.u.washington.edu (root@jason02.u.washington.edu [140.142.76.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA32234 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:09:40 -0800 Received: from vergil01.u.washington.edu (leibrand@vergil01.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.6]) by jason02.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA23314 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:09:39 -0800 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by vergil01.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA35248 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:09:38 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:09:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Ok... Is Unix Pine 4 also 32-bit, then? What's the difference between 16-bit and 32-bit programs, anyway? :) -- Scott Leibrand leibrand@u.washington.edu * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Shoeless in San Jose wrote: > > It's a 32-bit program. At best, you'd have to have Win32 running, and I > personally have never been able to get it to work the way it's supposed > to. > > Greg > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > Ok, but why? What is the technical limitation that prevents dos/3.1 > > machines from running Pine 4? > > > > Thanx. > > Scott Leibrand > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Terry Gray wrote: > > > > > Alas, > > > DOS/Win3 users are relegated to the Pine 3.9x family... and can therefore > > > share addressbooks only via remote filesystems, not IMAP. > > > > > > (Of course old machines also run telnet just fine :) > > > > > > Sorry... it's a "price of progress" > > > > > > -teg > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > > > > > Are there any plans to release a dos/win3.1 version of Pine 4? It's a > > > > major inconvenience for users to be unable to access their shared address > > > > book on older machines... > > > > > > > > Thanx. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:26:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA30156 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:26:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA05450; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:26:15 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id SAA17831; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:25:03 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA43554 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:21:34 -0800 Received: from mole.slip.net (mole.slip.net [207.171.193.16]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA30163; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:21:33 -0800 Received: from slip-3.slip.net ([207.171.193.17] ident=batchman) by mole.slip.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1) id 10R5Cc-0003EK-00; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:21:30 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:21:26 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Shoeless in San Jose To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Scott Leibrand X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN 16-bit programs were written for DOS / Windows 3.x, and 32-bit programs are more for Windows 95 / 98 / NT. On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > Ok... Is Unix Pine 4 also 32-bit, then? What's the difference between > 16-bit and 32-bit programs, anyway? :) > > -- > Scott Leibrand > leibrand@u.washington.edu > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Shoeless in San Jose wrote: > > > > > It's a 32-bit program. At best, you'd have to have Win32 running, and I > > personally have never been able to get it to work the way it's supposed > > to. > > > > Greg > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > > > Ok, but why? What is the technical limitation that prevents dos/3.1 > > > machines from running Pine 4? > > > > > > Thanx. > > > Scott Leibrand > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Terry Gray wrote: > > > > > > > Alas, > > > > DOS/Win3 users are relegated to the Pine 3.9x family... and can therefore > > > > share addressbooks only via remote filesystems, not IMAP. > > > > > > > > (Of course old machines also run telnet just fine :) > > > > > > > > Sorry... it's a "price of progress" > > > > > > > > -teg > > > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > > > > > > > Are there any plans to release a dos/win3.1 version of Pine 4? It's a > > > > > major inconvenience for users to be unable to access their shared address > > > > > book on older machines... > > > > > > > > > > Thanx. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:39:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA27600 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:39:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA05584; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:38:59 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id SAA08203; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:37:48 -0800 Received: from jason03.u.washington.edu (root@jason03.u.washington.edu [140.142.77.10]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA14354 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:33:57 -0800 Received: from vergil01.u.washington.edu (leibrand@vergil01.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.6]) by jason03.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA15848 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:33:56 -0800 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by vergil01.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id SAA31678 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:33:55 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:33:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I know that much. I'm interested more in the technical differences. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand@u.washington.edu * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Shoeless in San Jose wrote: > > 16-bit programs were written for DOS / Windows 3.x, and 32-bit programs > are more for Windows 95 / 98 / NT. > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > Ok... Is Unix Pine 4 also 32-bit, then? What's the difference between > > 16-bit and 32-bit programs, anyway? :) > > > > -- > > Scott Leibrand > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Shoeless in San Jose wrote: > > > > > > > > It's a 32-bit program. At best, you'd have to have Win32 running, and I > > > personally have never been able to get it to work the way it's supposed > > > to. > > > > > > Greg > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > > > > > Ok, but why? What is the technical limitation that prevents dos/3.1 > > > > machines from running Pine 4? > > > > > > > > Thanx. > > > > Scott Leibrand > > > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Terry Gray wrote: > > > > > > > > > Alas, > > > > > DOS/Win3 users are relegated to the Pine 3.9x family... and can therefore > > > > > share addressbooks only via remote filesystems, not IMAP. > > > > > > > > > > (Of course old machines also run telnet just fine :) > > > > > > > > > > Sorry... it's a "price of progress" > > > > > > > > > > -teg > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Are there any plans to release a dos/win3.1 version of Pine 4? It's a > > > > > > major inconvenience for users to be unable to access their shared address > > > > > > book on older machines... > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:46:41 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA30183 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA01580; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:46:35 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id UAA27723; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:45:24 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id UAA23828 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:41:22 -0800 Received: from viruswall.tc.fluke.com (viruswall.tc.fluke.com [206.138.179.18]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id UAA28332 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:41:21 -0800 Received: from 129.196.184.7 by viruswall.tc.fluke.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:41:33 -0800 Received: from dd.tc.fluke.com (root@dd.tc.fluke.com [129.196.136.109]) by mailhub.tc.fluke.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA24937; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dcd@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dd.tc.fluke.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA02920; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:41:18 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:41:18 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: David Dyck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Scott Leibrand X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > I know that much. I'm interested more in the technical differences. > > On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Shoeless in San Jose wrote: > > 16-bit programs were written for DOS / Windows 3.x, and 32-bit programs > > are more for Windows 95 / 98 / NT. Ok, I'll try to contribute something here. I just finished porting 2 apps from 16 bit to 32 bit (actually they were dll's). Anyway, we had the code written to be pretty portable already (68000, Sparc, Dos, linux), so except for changes in the way that win32 handled serial communication, it was pretty much re-compiling. Sometimes it can be simple, other times you can run into limits no arrays with more than 64K elements there are limits on the size of individual arrays. in 16 bit land you sometimes need to be aware that pointers could sometimes be a 16 bit segment, and a 16 bit offset I think there is a limit (like 4096) possible segments, although the newer compiler libraries try to merge many news into the same segment. I haven't looked at what services are provided in the libraries that they can't release, that may be an issue also. From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:33:04 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA19647 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:33:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA02132; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:33:01 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id VAA22465; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:31:51 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA24008 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:27:59 -0800 Received: from godai.maison-otaku.net (godai.maison-otaku.net [216.122.4.156]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id VAA13451 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:27:57 -0800 Received: from localhost (loki@localhost) by godai.maison-otaku.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA24650; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:27:37 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:27:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Jeremy Blackman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE/IMAP/RFC2369 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: godai.maison-otaku.net: loki owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Mark Crispin wrote: > > However, it works somewhat less well (e.g. not at all) over IMAP. As my > > primary method of reading my mail is over IMAP, this is a bit of a bummer > > for me. I would have thought I only needed to add the RFC2369 headers to > > the 'extraheaders' list, but it appears that doesn't do the trick. It > > just never populates the envelope variables for the listserver options... > > Did you put in proper envelope merging code into imap_parse_envelope() and > imap_parse_header()? D'oh! I cannot believe I overlooked that! Thank you! Now the patch works perfectly, over IMAP and over normal mbox connections. Several of my friends are using it now, since as more listservers begin to implement RFC2369, it's useful. Nice to be able to just hit '#' at a Message View screen and get 'subscribe', 'unsubscribe', 'help', and other Mailing List commands, as well as links to archives for the mailing list and such. :) Thanks again... now I probably should put the patch up somewhere in case other people want it. :) --Loki loki@maison-otaku.net / jeremy@lith.com / loki@lithtech.com From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:14:43 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA25406 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:14:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA04810; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:14:38 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id BAA14654; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:13:27 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA49884 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:09:26 -0800 Received: from oa.cmbchina.com ([202.96.161.125]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id BAA21994 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:09:23 -0800 Received: from usa.net ([202.96.161.117]) by oa.cmbchina.com (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2 9-3-1997)) with SMTP id 48256742.00321603; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 17:07:04 +0800 Message-Id: <36FDF1EF.C6D065EF@usa.net> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 17:10:07 +0800 Reply-To: shichunhui@usa.net Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: sch To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Porting pine to dos/windows ? References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Terry Gray X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Accept-Language: zh-CN X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Terry Gray wrote: > Hans, > We already provide a windows version of pine, but we can't release source > for it because it includes proprietary code that we licensed for the > windows version. > I think c-client is enough if we are trying to port pine to windows. I found that the pine,pico are sth deal with GUI,cfg and I guess the funtional work as sending, recving mail, parsing mail were done in c-client, but I still hope some documents will introduce the API offered by c-client lib, the documents should have been made by the devel group, and why not publish them on internet for pine community? > > However, for your project it may be sufficient to have access to the > c-client libraries, for which complete source is freely available. These > are used for both pc and Unix versions of Pine and provide all the > low-level MIME parsing and message access/storage routines. > > -teg > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 01:37:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA15469 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 01:37:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA29895; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 01:37:42 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id BAA27161; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 01:36:31 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA46630 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 01:30:39 -0800 Received: from chailly.ensmp.fr (chailly.ensmp.fr [192.54.172.200]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id BAA16057 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 01:30:35 -0800 Received: from coulommiers.ensmp.fr (coelho@coulommiers.ensmp.fr [192.54.172.245]) by chailly.ensmp.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8/chailly-CRI) with ESMTP id LAA27722; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:30:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (coelho@localhost) by coulommiers.ensmp.fr (8.8.7/8.8.5/client-linux_RK_CRI) with ESMTP id LAA01575; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:29:14 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:29:14 +0200 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Fabien COELHO To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: bug report In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-To: Jessica Rasku X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: coulommiers.ensmp.fr: coelho owned process doing -bs X-Sender: coelho@coulommiers.ensmp.fr X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > > It's actually pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu (which is changeable in the > > global configuration file. They also make mention of a "Report Bug" > > command. However, I've yet to find that "command" (though I've not > > looked terribly hard). >=20 > =09I have not found it in 4.05, but in 3.96, I didn't have a problem. > The address pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu as far as I can see is not in th= e > online documentation for 4.05. Maybe I'm missing something... Yep. The 4.10 online doc does specify a bug-report command, but I haven't found it. I haven't found the pine-bugs@... address in the documentation. --=20 Fabien COELHO __ http://www.cri.ensmp.fr/~coelho __ coelho@cri.ensmp.fr CRI-ENSMP, 35, rue Saint-Honor=E9, F-77305 Fontainebleau cedex, France phone: (+33|0) 1 64 69 {voice: 48 52, fax: 47 09, standard: 47 08} ________ All opinions expressed here are mine _________ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 07:12:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA22387 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 07:12:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA01989; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 07:12:16 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id HAA09653; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 07:11:57 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA44276 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 07:07:06 -0800 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([205.146.146.240]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id HAA01516 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 07:07:05 -0800 Received: from localhost by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id KAA0000008187; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 10:07:01 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 10:07:00 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PC-Pine 4.10 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Info mailing list X-Authentication-Warning: falcon.dickinson.edu: newcomer owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm doing some advance testing of PC-Pine 4.10 and another user reported to me that there was a delay in sending messages. I've been using my personal UNIX workstation as the SMTP server so it's been quick. However, if you use our multiuser UNIX box (even when the load is low), you can expect 20-30 seconds delay when you tell it to send the message. IMAP's not doing a thing so where is the delay coming from? Is there any way to minimize it? Thanks. ================================================================================ Don Newcomer Dickinson College Asst. Director of Computer Services P.O. Box 1773 newcomer@dickinson.edu Carlisle, PA 17013 Phone: (717) 245-1256 FAX: (717) 245-1690 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:15:41 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA25333 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:15:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA31783; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:15:38 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA29120; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:15:07 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA11674 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:11:00 -0800 Received: from kootcom.kootenay.net (kootcom.kootenay.net [209.52.230.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA29486 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:11:00 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by kootcom.kootenay.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA15407; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 17:15:06 GMT Received: from ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca by kootcom.kootenay.net; Mon, 29 Mar 99 09:15 PST Received: from localhost (jrasku@localhost) by ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA25782; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:00:50 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:00:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Jessica Rasku To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: bug report In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Fabien COELHO X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > > > It's actually pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu (which is changeable in the > > > global configuration file. They also make mention of a "Report Bug" > > > command. However, I've yet to find that "command" (though I've not > > > looked terribly hard). > > > > I have not found it in 4.05, but in 3.96, I didn't have a problem. > > The address pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu as far as I can see is not in the > > online documentation for 4.05. Maybe I'm missing something... > > Yep. The 4.10 online doc does specify a bug-report command, but I haven't > found it. I haven't found the pine-bugs@... address in the documentation. I know it is in there somewhere, as the core dump (which I seem to be getting far too many of lately), has that information in it. I think I also saw something that indicated that the ``report bug'' feature is also in there somewhere. This is in V4.05.... Jessica -- Jessica Rasku, Box 270, Rossland, B.C., V0G 1Y0, (250) 362-5701, LinuxBox: (250) 362-9668. List manager: majordomo@ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca send command help ---- To get help with majordomo or lists ---- To get a list of all lists on server. WWW: From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:31:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA25626 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:31:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA32212; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:31:45 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA09373; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:31:16 -0800 Received: from ns2.dataframe.net (ns2.dataframe.net [208.162.36.2]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA19146 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:26:51 -0800 Received: by NS2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:31:58 -0800 Message-Id: <01F0ACB8778CD1118A3C00A0C90575B613DF84@NS2> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:31:56 -0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Huang, Sean" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Project for AIX pine - Will Pay MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-To: "'pine-info@lists.u.washington.edu'" X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I apologize if this is not appropriate place to post this message. I have a project that needs to be done. * Install Pine in AIX system * Configure Pine so that it will read e-mail from an Exchange server * AIX can ping the Exchange Server * I can configure Exchange Server to support POP3 * I can provide a root account for configuring the Pine Can anyone let me know if you are interested? Please let me know how much you will charge and how long it will take. Thanks, Sean Huang Dataframe Logistics, Inc. 20451 E. Valley Blvd. Walnut, CA 91789 (909) 598-9997 (909) 598-0987 Fax shuang@dataframe.net From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:23:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA00982 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:23:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA18602; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:23:23 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id QAA01653; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:22:21 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA27024 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:17:47 -0800 Received: from calvin.twntpe.cdc.com (ip129179-17-10.a.cdc.com [129.179.17.10]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id QAA07784 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:17:44 -0800 Received: from edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com by calvin.twntpe.cdc.com; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:17:31 +0800 Message-Id: <000501be7a42$aa3ff120$1511b381@edspc17.twntpe.cdc.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:17:15 +0800 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: "Ed Greshko" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: PC-Pine 4.10 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Don Newcomer" X-Cc: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Don, > I'm doing some advance testing of PC-Pine 4.10 and another user > reported to me that there was a delay in sending messages. > I've been using my personal > UNIX workstation as the SMTP server so it's been quick. However, if you > use our multiuser UNIX box (even when the load is low), you can expect > 20-30 seconds delay when you tell it to send the message. IMAP's > not doing > a thing so where is the delay coming from? Is there any way to minimize > it? Thanks. It is early here, so I'm just confirming that when you hit "send" on PC-Pine you see the indication that the message is being send....but it takes 20-30 seconds for even a short message to be sent. You've tried PC-Pine using 2 different SMTP hosts. One is your Unix workstation and the other the shared Unix server. With your box all is OK. It is interfacing with the shared server that shows the delay. This is a "guess". Are the Unix systems using differenet versions of sendmail or different configurations? It is possible that the shared Unix host is doing reverse DNS lookups on the incoming SMTP connections and due to configuration issues in your DNS it may be taking some time to time out. Regards, Ed From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:55:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA04555 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:55:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA02458; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:55:34 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id IAA07622; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:55:03 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA43802 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:49:53 -0800 Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA23942 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:49:53 -0800 Received: from plains.NoDak.edu (bragan@plains.NoDak.edu [134.129.111.64]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id IAA27047 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:49:52 -0800 Received: from localhost (bragan@localhost) by plains.NoDak.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA12369 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 10:49:51 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 10:49:51 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: scooby doo To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine forward MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN HELP!! I know how to forward but how do you forward just messages from certain parties to others???? thank you bill /# /_\_ |\_|/__/| | |/o\o\ / / \/ \ \ | \\_/_/ /__|O||O|__ \ / |_ | |/_ \_/\_/ _\ | . _ . _____________ | ||\_ ~| | | (____) | || |\_|/__/| / \ | ||| \/ \/\___/\__/ // / / \/ \ \ / Happy! Happy! \ | |||_ (_/ || /__|O||O|__ \ \ Joy! Joy! / \// | | || |/_ \_/\_/ _\ | \ ___________/ || | | ||\ | | (____) | || |/ ||_ \ \ //_/ \/\___/\__/ // _/ \_| o| \______// (_/ || /\___/ __ || __|| | ||\ / ||||__ (____(____) \ //_/ (___)_) \______// __|| __|| (____(____) Stimpson J. Cat [Stimpy] -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:12:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA14823 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA02902; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:12:11 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id JAA01898; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:11:53 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA21694 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:07:36 -0800 Received: from kens.com (kens.com [209.70.169.2]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id JAA26763 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:07:36 -0800 Received: from kens.com (kens.com [209.70.169.2]) by kens.com (8.9.3/8.9.3-mod-for-majordomo) with ESMTP id MAA21801; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 12:07:26 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 12:07:25 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Ken Woods To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine forward In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: scooby doo X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, scooby doo wrote: > HELP!! Yes, you certainly need it. > I know how to forward but how do you forward just messages from > certain parties to others???? man procmail (snip. snip, snip and snip, ascii art in a sig. *sigh*) -- Ken Woods kwoods@kens.com From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:10:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA14926 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:10:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA11680; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:10:48 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id PAA20647; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:10:06 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA41206 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:05:24 -0800 Received: from mail1.new-york.net (SYSTEM@mail1.new-york.net [165.254.2.54]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA19939 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:05:22 -0800 Received: from aleph.ii.com ("port 1396"@aleph.ii.com) by mail1.new-york.net (PMDF V5.1-10 #22885) with ESMTP id <01J9HMD3HH6G0025AA@mail1.new-york.net> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 18:05:11 -0500 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 18:04:13 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: disable-keymenu ... MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ii@mail1.new-york.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN ... is no longer listed in the Pine Configuration Screen feature-list. It does work if you add it manually to your pinerc so it seems to have become a hidden feature. Is this a bug or feature? -- For Pine info & links, see www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/ ŠNancy McGough http://www.ii.com Infinite Ink --= Sent via PINE: Power Internet News & Email for Win/Unix =-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:56:56 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA15909 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:56:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA13060; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:56:53 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id PAA23351; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:56:31 -0800 Received: from jason02.u.washington.edu (root@jason02.u.washington.edu [140.142.76.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA28480 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:52:33 -0800 Received: from vergil01.u.washington.edu (leibrand@vergil01.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.6]) by jason02.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA14434 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:52:33 -0800 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by vergil01.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA47374 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:52:32 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:52:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable-keymenu ... In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Sounds like a feature. :) Does disable-keymenu disable the bottom two lines that tell you what to press? I would think you wouldn't want ignorant users (like most the 40,000+ Pine users here at the UW are) disabling that and not knowing what to do... -- Scott Leibrand leibrand@u.washington.edu * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Nancy McGough wrote: > ... is no longer listed in the Pine Configuration Screen feature-list. > It does work if you add it manually to your pinerc so it seems to have > become a hidden feature. Is this a bug or feature? > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:40:38 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupfs.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA17741 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:40:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA05131; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:40:35 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id RAA17649; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:38:15 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA19186 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:11:21 -0800 Received: from kootcom.kootenay.net (kootcom.kootenay.net [209.52.230.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA31000; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:11:20 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by kootcom.kootenay.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA05552; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 01:15:36 GMT Received: from ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca by kootcom.kootenay.net; Wed, 31 Mar 99 17:15 PST Received: from localhost (jrasku@localhost) by ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA11982; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:06:58 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:06:57 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk From: Jessica Rasku To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable-keymenu ... In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Scott Leibrand X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > Sounds like a feature. :) Does disable-keymenu disable the bottom two > lines that tell you what to press? I would think you wouldn't want > ignorant users (like most the 40,000+ Pine users here at the UW are) > disabling that and not knowing what to do... If you really think that it is something that you don't want changed, you can put it in the pine.conf.fixed file, and make it not configurable. I would say that it's not something worth making not configurable. People who want to do it, can get quite irate when certian features are no longer avalable... Jessica -- Jessica Rasku, Box 270, Rossland, B.C., V0G 1Y0, (250) 362-5701, LinuxBox: (250) 362-9668. List manager: majordomo@ArmispianSystems.Rossland.bc.ca send command help ---- To get help with majordomo or lists ---- To get a list of all lists on server. WWW: